The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2757-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Performance Analysis of Free Space Quantum Key Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, they did not measure the impacts of key rate generations. Due to the complications to define the exact atmospheric losses, several QKD experiments did not include detailed parameters while conducting those experiments [20]. They simply defined the overall atmospheric attenuation in decibel without presenting the calculations of geometrical losses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, they did not measure the impacts of key rate generations. Due to the complications to define the exact atmospheric losses, several QKD experiments did not include detailed parameters while conducting those experiments [20]. They simply defined the overall atmospheric attenuation in decibel without presenting the calculations of geometrical losses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the final secret key length relies on Eve's information about the raw keys. Secret key rates (SKRs) and quantum bit error rates (QBERs), to be referred to in [11,13,20], are used to evaluate QKD's output over FSO's. SKR can be defined as the probability of obtaining a bit of secret key per transmitted quantum signal pulse [4], while QBER is determined by the probability ratio of error bits and the overall probability of Bob detection.…”
Section: Formulation Of Fso Multiphoton Quantum Cryptographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation