2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.02.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and optimization of hollow fiber DCMD module for desalination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it should be noted that these modules were tested under the same flow rate, thus both Re f and Re p decreased significantly with increasing packing density  . Based on 24 hydraulic calculations, the Re f ranged from 4700 ( =3.5%) to 1100 ( =40%) and the Re p decreased accordingly because of the increasing number of fibers. Therefore, the hydrodynamic conditions at the membrane surface deteriorated from loosely packed to tightly packed modules.…”
Section: Fiber Packing Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, it should be noted that these modules were tested under the same flow rate, thus both Re f and Re p decreased significantly with increasing packing density  . Based on 24 hydraulic calculations, the Re f ranged from 4700 ( =3.5%) to 1100 ( =40%) and the Re p decreased accordingly because of the increasing number of fibers. Therefore, the hydrodynamic conditions at the membrane surface deteriorated from loosely packed to tightly packed modules.…”
Section: Fiber Packing Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the hollow fiber module could potentially have the least temperature polarization among various module configurations [21]. 6 However, there are limited reports available on improving fluid dynamics and designing hollow fiber modules for MD applications in the open literature [22][23][24][25]. Some relevant studies have focused on the effect of packing density, flow maldistribution and hydrodynamic behavior in the shell side of hollow fiber modules, based on studies of various gas-liquid/ liquid-liquid contactors [26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Figure 1, we observe that it is easier to put more effective area into the hollow fibre module with less restriction than that of the flat sheet module, however, turbulence promoters are likely to be required to reduce temperature polarisation. One of the main impediments of the hollow fibre module is its typically low flux, which is generally 1-4 L.m -2 h -1 at 40-60°C [4][5][6]. This is much lower than that of the flat sheet membranes with fluxes of 20-30 L.m -2 h -1 [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross section of principal layer e. Cross section of outer skin layer wetting, i.e. large molecule will not pass through the pores and cause wetting of the membrane, and it also can improve antifouling effect [19,20] and thereby improve the performance performance [5]. The BJH adsorption pore size distribution measure in range of 0.0017-0.3 μm is presented in Figure μm and the other appears where the pore size is larger than 0.16 μm, corresponding to results found in the SEM image 7c.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%