2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and optimization in dry face milling of X2CrNi18-9 austenitic stainless steel using RMS and desirability approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers have developed surface roughness prediction models in face milling using AI (Srinivasa Pai et al 2002;Vosniakos 2002, 2003;Saglam and Unuvar 2003;Bruni et al 2008;El-Sonbaty et al 2008;Lela et al 2009;Muñoz-Escalona and Maropoulos 2010;Razfar et al 2011;Bharathi Raja and Baskar 2012;Grzenda et al 2012;Bajić et al 2012;Kovac et al 2013;Simunovic et al 2013;Grzenda and Bustillo 2013;Elhami et al 2013;Saric et al 2013;Rodríguez et al 2017;Simunovic et al 2016;Selaimia et al 2017;Svalina et al 2017). Srinivasa Pai et al (2002 presented an estimation of flank wear in face milling based on the radial basis function (RBF) of neural networks using acoustic emission signals, surface roughness, and cutting conditions (cutting speed and feed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many researchers have developed surface roughness prediction models in face milling using AI (Srinivasa Pai et al 2002;Vosniakos 2002, 2003;Saglam and Unuvar 2003;Bruni et al 2008;El-Sonbaty et al 2008;Lela et al 2009;Muñoz-Escalona and Maropoulos 2010;Razfar et al 2011;Bharathi Raja and Baskar 2012;Grzenda et al 2012;Bajić et al 2012;Kovac et al 2013;Simunovic et al 2013;Grzenda and Bustillo 2013;Elhami et al 2013;Saric et al 2013;Rodríguez et al 2017;Simunovic et al 2016;Selaimia et al 2017;Svalina et al 2017). Srinivasa Pai et al (2002 presented an estimation of flank wear in face milling based on the radial basis function (RBF) of neural networks using acoustic emission signals, surface roughness, and cutting conditions (cutting speed and feed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simunovic et al (2016) presented a machined surface roughness investigation based on the features of a digital image such as spindle speed, feed per tooth, and cutting depth, but without considering tool wear; the digital image was produced following a milling operation of an aluminum alloy Al6060. Selaimia et al (2017) modeled the output responses, namely: surface roughness (Ra), cutting force (FC), cutting power (PC), specific cutting force (KS) and metal removal rate (MRR) during the face milling of the austenitic stainless steel X2CrNi18-9 with coated carbide inserts (GC4040). ANOVA was used for evaluating the influence of the cutting parameters: cutting speed (VC), feed per tooth and depth of cut (aP) on the output responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process-parameter ranges are shown in Table 1, and were selected based on preliminary research work. 19 Fifteen sets of experiments were conducted for the microhardness and surface roughness with central composite face centred (CCF) design of the response surface methodology. The face milled diesel engine head is depicted in Figure 2.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research work, the selection of the method is considered on the desirability function (DF) approach, which allows the optimization with a multi-objective criterion. [18][19][20] This approach widely used by several researchers for reasons of its weighting flexibility, simplicity and insertion in statistical software. 21,22 The present research concentrates on a machinability characteristic study of a newly cast, A413, dieselengine-head aluminium alloy produced under optimal casting conditions by pressure die casting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A so-called desirability approach was applied in Reference [15] for the modelling of the following output responses by Response Surface Methodology (RMS): surface roughness (Ra), cutting force (Fc), cutting power (Pc), specific cutting force (Ks) and metal removal rate (MRR), during the face milling of the austenitic stainless steel X2CrNi18-9 with coated carbide inserts (GC4040). A full factorial design (L27) is selected for the experiments and ANOVA is used in order to evaluate the influence of the cutting parameters of cutting speed (v c ), feed per tooth and depth of cut (a p ) on the out-put responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%