2011 IEEE 17th International on-Line Testing Symposium 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iolts.2011.5993802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and mitigating NBTI in nanoscale circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In more detail, PV can be categorized in two main groups: (1) inter-die and (2) intra-die variations [12]. Due to inter-die variations, the same device on a die can have different characteristics across various dies.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In more detail, PV can be categorized in two main groups: (1) inter-die and (2) intra-die variations [12]. Due to inter-die variations, the same device on a die can have different characteristics across various dies.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach, [11], uses an experimentally verified NBTI model to study DC noise margins in conventional 6T SRAM cells as a function of NBTI degradation in the presence of PVs. Considering functional logic, the authors of [12] propose a transistor sizing technique that not only mitigates NBTI induced delay of the gate under consideration, but also minimizes its impact on the adjacent gates. This technique seems to be very effective, but it is mandatory to identify the critical gates and paths within the circuit in order to apply it.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach [8] uses an experimentally verified NBTI model to study DC noise margins in conventional 6T SRAM cells as a function of NBTI degradation in the presence of process variations. Considering functional logic, the authors of [9] propose a transistor sizing technique that not only mitigates NBTI induced delay of the gate under consideration, but also minimizes its impact on the adjacent gates. This technique seems to be very effective, but it is mandatory to identify the critical gates and paths within the circuit in order to apply such technique.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method reduces the area penalty of gate-level sizing by an average of 43%. Khan et al studied another transistor-level sizing method that considered the impact of transistor sizing on its adjacent gates [8]. It further reduces the area overhead by 50% as compared with [7].…”
Section: November/december 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%