2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2015.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and experiment of a handy motion driven, frequency up-converting electromagnetic energy harvester using transverse impact by spherical ball

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24][25][26] However, human motion is more difficult to capture than typical vibrations because it is slow, often nonperiodic, and occurs along all three linear and rotational axes. Several basic mechanical architectures for the energy capture system have been proposed, including eccentrically weighted rotors with 27 and without a restoring spring, 4,28-34 linear slides or oscillators, 5,[35][36][37][38][39] and a spherical magnet rolling inside a spherical cavity. 40,41 (See Figure 4.) Each design has its advantages, but the eccentric rotor seems to be the most prevalent and has the advantage that it can be excited by linear or rotational motion about any axis and it responds well to slow motions.…”
Section: Inertial Energy Harvesting System Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] However, human motion is more difficult to capture than typical vibrations because it is slow, often nonperiodic, and occurs along all three linear and rotational axes. Several basic mechanical architectures for the energy capture system have been proposed, including eccentrically weighted rotors with 27 and without a restoring spring, 4,28-34 linear slides or oscillators, 5,[35][36][37][38][39] and a spherical magnet rolling inside a spherical cavity. 40,41 (See Figure 4.) Each design has its advantages, but the eccentric rotor seems to be the most prevalent and has the advantage that it can be excited by linear or rotational motion about any axis and it responds well to slow motions.…”
Section: Inertial Energy Harvesting System Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, human body‐induced vibrations, including walking, running, jumping, and handshaking, are low frequency (less than 10 Hz), have large amplitudes, and are time varying . One major challenge to the sufficient power generation from low frequency biomechanical vibrations is due to power loss found in conventional resonant‐based energy harvesters operating at low frequencies . To combat this, a nonresonant, nonlinear energy harvesting technique could be employed at low frequency and under low magnitude excitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23][24] One major challenge to the sufficient power generation from low frequency biomechanical vibrations is due to power loss found in conventional resonantbased energy harvesters operating at low frequencies. [25][26][27] To combat this, a nonresonant, nonlinear energy harvesting technique could be employed at low frequency and under low magnitude excitations. The design of sophisticated mechanical systems requires new energy conversion mechanisms for micro-and nanogenerators in the energy harvesting field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As power is directly proportional to the operating frequency, the frequency-up conversion is implemented to achieve the desired amount of average power from human body movement. 48,49 Also due to frequency-doubling characteristics of some EMEH, more power is generated from low frequency. 50 Contrarily, by introducing switching damping, the resonant frequency can be altered but some loss also occurs in power outcome.…”
Section: Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%