2012
DOI: 10.1193/1.4000009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Estimating Post-Earthquake Fire Spread

Abstract: This paper describes the development of a GIS-based dynamic fire-spread model, with seven distinct modes of fire spread: direct contact, spontaneous ignition of claddings, piloted ignition of claddings, spontaneous ignition through windows, piloted ignition through broken windows, fire spread via non-fire-rated roofs and branding. All except the first two modes include in-built probabilities, but these can be selected individually and given user-defined values. Fire spread modes can be added to the model or al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, validation is a problem for all FFE modelling due to relatively few events having occurred in recent decades. The original fire spread models that this study are based upon have been validated against the 1931 Napier and 1995 Kobe events with good results [16]. However, the required data for validation of the models used in the current study were not readily available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, validation is a problem for all FFE modelling due to relatively few events having occurred in recent decades. The original fire spread models that this study are based upon have been validated against the 1931 Napier and 1995 Kobe events with good results [16]. However, the required data for validation of the models used in the current study were not readily available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical separation distances signify the maximum distance a fire can spread given the wind conditions and rules to account for physical fire behaviour such as direct contact, heat radiation and branding. The values were derived from loss and wind speed data as reported from historical US earthquakes by Scawthorn [37], and the method is described in Thomas et al [16].…”
Section: Fire Spread Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%