2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.11.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and discretization errors in large eddy simulations of hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic channel flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To study high Reynolds number flows using LES, we tested several conventional models with our in-house solver (which is based on a finite-volume scheme in a collocated variable arrangement) that has been extensively used for DNS of liquid metal flows. Consistently with Viré et al (2011), our initial results were unsatisfactory, and we identified the scheme’s numerical dissipation as a reason for this observation. We then focused on the usage of improved SGS models (Prinz et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…To study high Reynolds number flows using LES, we tested several conventional models with our in-house solver (which is based on a finite-volume scheme in a collocated variable arrangement) that has been extensively used for DNS of liquid metal flows. Consistently with Viré et al (2011), our initial results were unsatisfactory, and we identified the scheme’s numerical dissipation as a reason for this observation. We then focused on the usage of improved SGS models (Prinz et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…resolutions used in DNS. Here, we cannot directly apply the summation-by-parts approach, since it involves the so-called flux variables, prescribed at the cell interface (Viré et al 2011). These flux variables are used in the algorithm to secure divergence-free condition and conservative form of the nonlinear terms, but not stored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct computation of S ij S ij tends to yield underpredicted values, especially if the discretization errors are large. For example, in case of coarse grids, more pertinent to LES however, the difference between direct computation of S ij S ij and summation by parts can yield a factor of 2-2.5 in the buffer and logarithmic layer regions (Viré et al 2011). Albeit this difference scales as ∼O(h 2 ) (with h being the mesh step-size) for the 2nd-order approximations, it cannot be completely neglected, even in case of finer Appendix B.…”
Section: Author Orcidsmentioning
confidence: 99%