2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of finite difference approaches in simulation of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence at low magnetic Reynolds number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical model is based on the explicit projection-type finite difference scheme of second order described as the scheme B in Krasnov et al (2011a). The scheme uses the collocated grid arrangement and follows the principles developed by Morinishi et al (1998) and extended to liquid metal MHD by Ni et al (2007).…”
Section: Physical Model and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical model is based on the explicit projection-type finite difference scheme of second order described as the scheme B in Krasnov et al (2011a). The scheme uses the collocated grid arrangement and follows the principles developed by Morinishi et al (1998) and extended to liquid metal MHD by Ni et al (2007).…”
Section: Physical Model and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a numerical method, we apply the finite difference scheme described by Krasnov, Zikanov & Boeck (2011a). The scheme is based on the conservative discretization of Morinishi et al (1998) extended to the case of MHD flows by Ni et al (2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For later comparisons with the DNS results, we solve the above model equations (14) to (16) by a finite-difference method on a uniform grid.…”
Section: One-dimensional Approximate Model Of Kamkar and Moffatt (Km82)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The equations are discretized using a second-order finite difference scheme with a collocated grid arrangement. The formulations proposed by Morinishi et al 26 and Ni et al 28 are incorporated into the code making the numerical scheme highly conservative for mass, momentum, and electric charge.…”
Section: Direct Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%