The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v36n3p449-459/2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and correction of soil penetration resistance for variations in soil moisture and soil bulk density

Abstract: This study aimed to describe the behavior of models for adjusting data of soil penetration resistance for variations in soil moisture and soil bulk density. The study was carried out in Lucas do Rio Verde, MT, Brazil in a typic dystrophic red-yellow Latosol (Oxisol) containing 0.366 kg kg −1 of clay. Soil penetration resistance measurements were conducted in the soil moistures of 0.33 kg kg −1 , 0.28 kg kg −1 , 0.25 kg kg −1 and 0.22 kg kg −1 . Soil penetration resistance behavior due to variations in soil moi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
19
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Penetration resistance is influenced entirely by soil moisture, as already demonstrated by several authors (Vaz et al 2011;Silva et al 2016), and there is a general trend of reduction (exponential) in penetration resistance with an increase in soil moisture, which is attributed to the lubricating effect of moisture on cone penetration. Consequently, to compare values measured under different moisture conditions and ensure reliable comparisons, the data obtained should be Engenharia Agrícola, Jaboticabal, v.40, n.4, p.462-472, jul./aug.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Penetration resistance is influenced entirely by soil moisture, as already demonstrated by several authors (Vaz et al 2011;Silva et al 2016), and there is a general trend of reduction (exponential) in penetration resistance with an increase in soil moisture, which is attributed to the lubricating effect of moisture on cone penetration. Consequently, to compare values measured under different moisture conditions and ensure reliable comparisons, the data obtained should be Engenharia Agrícola, Jaboticabal, v.40, n.4, p.462-472, jul./aug.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This finding suggests the need for long-term experiments and confirms the inertia of the Veneto region silty soil in response to management changes (Camarotto et al, 2018). Surprisingly, PR did not always reflect the BD pattern: PR was differentially affected by BD as a function of moisture and soil type (da Silva et al, 2016;Vaz, Manieri, de Maria, & Tuller, 2011). In contrast, the ERT survey highlighted good potential for detecting soil structural changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is because the use of fire to clean fields reduces soil humidity and increases its cohesion, hence increasing resistance to penetration. Under low humidity, soil resistance to penetration varies widely and can lead to soil-metal friction by soil cohesion and adhesion increases after moisture loss (Silva et al, 2016). Conventional and notillage areas showed penetration resistance increases at all depths and humidity reductions compared to the others.…”
Section: Soil Resistance To Penetration Retention Curve Physical Anmentioning
confidence: 98%