2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11044-018-09640-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and analysis of friction including rolling effects in multibody dynamics: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This movement process of the piston is continued until the stroke end of the piston. This characteristic is called "stick-slip" motion and has been observed in pneumatic cylinders (Sakiichi et al, 1988;Peng et al, 2012) and in other mechanisms (Mate et al, 1987;Lampaert et al, 2004;Landolsi et al, 2009). This motion of the piston can be explained that when air is supplied to the chamber 1, air is compressed and the pressure p 1 is increased (in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This movement process of the piston is continued until the stroke end of the piston. This characteristic is called "stick-slip" motion and has been observed in pneumatic cylinders (Sakiichi et al, 1988;Peng et al, 2012) and in other mechanisms (Mate et al, 1987;Lampaert et al, 2004;Landolsi et al, 2009). This motion of the piston can be explained that when air is supplied to the chamber 1, air is compressed and the pressure p 1 is increased (in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Classical friction models that describe the steady-state relation between velocity and friction force, which can be characterized by the viscous and Coulomb friction with Stribeck effect combination have been proposed (Hibi and Ichikawa, 1977;Armstrong, 1991;Armstrong et al, 1994;Pennestrì et al, 2016;Marques et al, 2016Marques et al, , 2019Brown and McPhee, 2016). However, some friction behaviours cannot be captured by these classical friction models, as for example, hys-teretic behaviour with oscillating velocity, stiction behaviour and breakaway-force variations (Armstrong et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the frictional interactions of joints and moving parts and flexibility of the links are neglected. Studies on various friction models with verified experimental data [17][18][19][20][21] and studies on hysteresis including structural flexibility or clearances of the joints have been continuously conducted [21][22][23][24][25]. Following to this state of art, the causes of link hysteresis will be dealt with and a sophisticated model including friction model of the joints will be developed in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact parameters of the ANN input are derived from a positive pressure (Hunt–Crossley) model and a friction (LuGre) model, which are caused by the load and driving torque qw of walking wheel and describe the influence of relative contact indentation, normal velocity and tangential velocity on the contact force. These contact models appear to be the most accepted in the scientific community being the most widely used, and here we list the Hunt–Crossley 25–27 and LuGre 2830 formulas (1) and (2) only where Fn is the normal contact force, K is the contact-stiffness parameter, χ=3(1-cr)K/2crδ·0 is the hysteresis damping factor which is intended for use in a contact between softer materials that have a smaller coefficient of restitution cr, and more elastic contacts with higher values of energy dissipation. These types of contact properties can be found in wheel-cable coupling; δ·0 is the initial relative contact velocity in the normal direction.…”
Section: Contact Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%