2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling aggressive driver behavior at unsignalized intersections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A couple of recent studies have also used observations at an intersection to record such characteristics as changing lanes, gap acceptance, and acceleration/deceleration rates to declare an act as being aggressive (see Kaysi andAbbany, 2007 andHamdar et al, 2008). Such observations are then correlated with the gender/age of the driver and situational/environmental factors.…”
Section: Aggressive Driving Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A couple of recent studies have also used observations at an intersection to record such characteristics as changing lanes, gap acceptance, and acceleration/deceleration rates to declare an act as being aggressive (see Kaysi andAbbany, 2007 andHamdar et al, 2008). Such observations are then correlated with the gender/age of the driver and situational/environmental factors.…”
Section: Aggressive Driving Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serag [12] used a gap/lag acceptance binary logit model considering the aggressive behavior of drivers as a factor which influences the probability of acceptance of a gap or lag. Kaisy and Abbany [13] had also investigated the aggressive behavior of minor street drivers at priority unsignalized intersections. A behavioral model is formulated which is incorporated into a simulation framework to estimate the delay and conflict measures at unsignalized intersections.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature review [12][13][14] revealed that very few studies are available which considers the aggressive …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gap and choice situation factors may include gap size, speed of vehicles, type of subject and conflicting vehicle types, waiting time, type of sign control, etc. [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Many researchers dealt with gap acceptance at unsignalized intersections with the assumption that priority is fully respected, such as Hawkes [7], Ashworth [8,9], Ashton [10], Miller [11], Polus et al [12], Davis and Swenson [13], Xu and Tian [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The driver characteristics that affect the gap acceptance decision may include gender, age, driving skill, etc. [1][2][3]. Gap and choice situation factors may include gap size, speed of vehicles, type of subject and conflicting vehicle types, waiting time, type of sign control, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%