2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2016.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model test to investigate waterproof-resistant slab minimum safety thickness for water inrush geohazards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang, Jiang, et al (2014) simulated the entire process of crack formation, the propagation of buried faults, and the evolution of water inrush channel under high-pressure water in a coal mine floor, and revealed the lagging water inrush mechanism of the coal floor in a confined water body. Jiang et al (2017) developed a model test system to simulate water inrush and studied the effect of the strata pressure, hydraulic pressure and waterproof-resistant slab thickness of the surrounding rock on water inrush. Liang et al (2016) analyzed the change laws of stress, displacement and water pressure based on the physical simulation experiment of water inrush in tunnel excavation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang, Jiang, et al (2014) simulated the entire process of crack formation, the propagation of buried faults, and the evolution of water inrush channel under high-pressure water in a coal mine floor, and revealed the lagging water inrush mechanism of the coal floor in a confined water body. Jiang et al (2017) developed a model test system to simulate water inrush and studied the effect of the strata pressure, hydraulic pressure and waterproof-resistant slab thickness of the surrounding rock on water inrush. Liang et al (2016) analyzed the change laws of stress, displacement and water pressure based on the physical simulation experiment of water inrush in tunnel excavation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculated the safe thickness by the formula (1) with the parameter (A=1, λ=1.4, D=20, H=200), the calculated results is 1.86m. According to literature [7], the actual thickness of rock wall in Maluqing Tunnel is 1.5m. Combined with the foregoing research conclusions and results of this case, Safe thickness of rock wall by formula (1) is close to the reserved thickness in projects.…”
Section: Engineering Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimal safe thickness of rock wall was provided based on the catastrophic characters of water inrush by Sun, et al [5].Guo established the formula to calculate the safe thickness of a rock wall based on critical water pressure [6]. Jiang et al investigated waterproof-resistant slab minimum safety thickness for water inrush geohazards according to the large-scale geomechanical model test [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [19] proposed the key-hole grouting method and applied it to the treatment of high-pressure water inrush in fractured rock mass. Jiang et al and Liu et al [20,21] established a simplified model to simulate the whole process of water inrush and carried out a series of large-scale geomechanical model tests. The influence of formation pressure, water pressure, and thickness of waterproof board on water inrush is studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%