2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model structure selection for switched NARX system identification: A randomized approach

Abstract: The identification of switched systems is a challenging problem, which entails both combinatorial (sample-mode assignment) and continuous (parameter estimation) features. A general framework for this problem has been recently developed, which alternates between parameter estimation and sample-mode assignment, solving both tasks to global optimality under mild conditions. This article extends this framework to the nonlinear case, which further aggravates the combinatorial complexity of the identification proble… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of jump input‐output models is addressed in Reference 15 by placing a penalty on mode transitions, in order to control the switching frequency, and retrieving the switching signal by way of dynamic programming. This work has been further extended to jump Box‐Jenkins model in Reference 16 and to jump polynomial nonlinear ARX models in Reference 17. The penalty term plays a similar role to the mode‐switching constraints mentioned previously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The identification of jump input‐output models is addressed in Reference 15 by placing a penalty on mode transitions, in order to control the switching frequency, and retrieving the switching signal by way of dynamic programming. This work has been further extended to jump Box‐Jenkins model in Reference 16 and to jump polynomial nonlinear ARX models in Reference 17. The penalty term plays a similar role to the mode‐switching constraints mentioned previously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… In this article, ny$$ {n}_y $$ and nu$$ {n}_u $$ are assumed to be known as an a priori information. Otherwise, a model structure selection has to be added to the identification process, as done for example, in References 19 or 17.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not rely on detailed knowledge of the system's internals but uses sufficient input-output data to fit the model, which can then be used to predict the system's output under different input data. Common black-box models include the Volterra model [5,6], neural network model [7][8][9], nonlinear autoregressive network (NARX) [10], nonlinear autoregressive moving average (NARMAX) [11], and state-space model (SSM) [12,13]. Although black-box models do not provide physical insights into the system, their flexibility and reliance on data make them highly suitable for capturing and modeling complex nonlinear behaviors; thus, they are widely used in the identification and modeling of nonlinear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Switching models are widely used in engineering practices [19,20]. Such models have several modes with different dynamical properties, and the modes are associated with various operating conditions [21,22]. e difficulty in switching system identification is that the times of the operating points (model identities) may be unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%