2009
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2008.2007032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Predictive Direct Torque Control—Part II: Implementation and Experimental Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
116
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Henceforth, the observers of (19) with the outputs of (19) are called the DOBs. The structure of the proposed method is depicted in Figure 4.…”
Section: Proposed Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henceforth, the observers of (19) with the outputs of (19) are called the DOBs. The structure of the proposed method is depicted in Figure 4.…”
Section: Proposed Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [1] explicitly use the name two-step-ahead prediction for a method using an estimation step and a single prediction step. In [7] the estimation step is called the initial state projection. Prediction The next step, the prediction step, covers future update periods where all possible future switch state sequences are considered.…”
Section: Finite-set Model Based Predictive Control For Power Elecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the model predictive direct torque control (MPDTC) algorithm is used to maintain the motor torque, stator flux, and the inverter's neutral point potential within the given hysteresis bounds by reducing the average switching frequency of the inverter, unlike the process in the conventional DTC method. Studies have reported that the MPDTC algorithm can achieve an average inverter switching frequency reduction of 16.5% [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%