2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icit.2009.4939728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Predictive Control with constant switching frequency using a Discrete Space Vector Modulation with virtual state vectors

Abstract: Abstract-Finite States Model Predictive Control (FS-MPC) appears as a promising control technique to be applied to power converters in the industry. However, the FS-MPC presents some drawbacks as non constant switching frequency and high sampling frequency. This work proposes a FS-MPC with constant switching frequency and low sampling frequency applying a Discrete Space Vector Modulation (DSVM) technique. The real state vectors of the converter are used together with new virtual state vectors forming switching… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays the other strategy which is widely common in power electronics field thanks to development of microcontrollers and power electronic switching devices is non-linear controllers including adaptive control, repetitive control, fuzzy control and Model Predictive Control (MPC) [22][23][24]. In [25,26] based on MPC mitigate CMV in three-phase PWM inverters but as they just use 6 active vectors the THD cannot be as low as the proposed method in [27] which applies some extra virtual vectors without any CMV concerning. In this paper an eclectic approach for alleviating CMV with a generally satisfactory performance by using the concept of RCMV-PWM and Model Predictive Current Control has been proposed which provides drives with lower level of CMV in comparison with current predictive control algorithm without considering CMV reduction, along with better THD than previously introduced methods [25,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nowadays the other strategy which is widely common in power electronics field thanks to development of microcontrollers and power electronic switching devices is non-linear controllers including adaptive control, repetitive control, fuzzy control and Model Predictive Control (MPC) [22][23][24]. In [25,26] based on MPC mitigate CMV in three-phase PWM inverters but as they just use 6 active vectors the THD cannot be as low as the proposed method in [27] which applies some extra virtual vectors without any CMV concerning. In this paper an eclectic approach for alleviating CMV with a generally satisfactory performance by using the concept of RCMV-PWM and Model Predictive Current Control has been proposed which provides drives with lower level of CMV in comparison with current predictive control algorithm without considering CMV reduction, along with better THD than previously introduced methods [25,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2 possible output states will increase and the minimization can be done much more effectively. In fact by producing a few virtual states caused by real vectors this is achievable [27] (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Real and Virtaul Voltage Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The traditional model predictive control strategy used discrete mathematics model to calculate current predictive value under the different states of the switch and make the switch condition selected through cost function when the current predictive value and the command current value is closest [10,11]. Therefore, a key part of the model predictive control strategy is to establish discrete mathematics model of the system and evaluate the switch state control behavior by the cost function.…”
Section: Traditional Current Model Predictive Control Of Three-level mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In power electronic converters, with high power ratings, losses due to switching often becomes the limiting factor. Various FS-MPC methods have been presented [1]- [5] to minimize the switching frequency while attempting to track the reference as close as possible. However, a lower switching frequency comes at a cost which typically result in a larger ripple current and voltage and consequently a higher THD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%