2019
DOI: 10.1088/2399-7532/ab3bdd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model of a structural battery and its potential for system level mass savings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the electrical energy storage is integrated in the structural material of the vehicle—via multifunctional materials coined as “structural battery composites or structural power composites.” [ 5–8 ] Electrical energy storage in structural load paths has been shown to offer large mass savings for cars, aircraft, consumer electronics, etc. [ 9–15 ] Due to their multifunctionality, structural battery composites are often referred to as “mass‐less energy storage” and have the potential to revolutionize the future design of electric vehicles and devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the electrical energy storage is integrated in the structural material of the vehicle—via multifunctional materials coined as “structural battery composites or structural power composites.” [ 5–8 ] Electrical energy storage in structural load paths has been shown to offer large mass savings for cars, aircraft, consumer electronics, etc. [ 9–15 ] Due to their multifunctionality, structural battery composites are often referred to as “mass‐less energy storage” and have the potential to revolutionize the future design of electric vehicles and devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] Electrical energy storage in structural load paths has been shown to offer large mass savings for cars, aircraft, consumer electronics, etc. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Due to their multifunctionality, structural battery composites are often referred to as "mass-less energy storage" and have the potential to revolutionize the future design of electric vehicles and devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative interpretation of the optimization of the multifunctional materials was proposed by Johannisson et al [ 28 ]. This approach instead focused on calculating the mass of the structural battery m SB and compared it to the combined mass of an equivalent carbon fiber composite plate m CC and of a standard lithium-ion battery m LiB .…”
Section: Multifunctionality Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Conceptualization of composite structural batteries. ( a ) Laminated structural battery from Johannisson et al [ 28 ]. ( b ) 3D structural battery from Carlson et al [ 24 ].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27] However, it is notable that this approach results in no gravimetric advantage for the system compared to simply just externally connecting the battery, and can result in a mechanical disadvantage for the composite at the battery packaging/epoxy interface. With this said, only recently have approaches been demonstrated for direct integration of battery materials into structural composites, but these approaches so far have demonstrated negligibly low energy density relative to the total mass of combined active and composite materials with moderate cycling stability [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] or moderate energy density and low cycling stability. 38 Outside of structural batteries, it is known that surfaces and interfaces are critical to achieve stable, high performance energy storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%