2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2007.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-free visualization of suspicious lesions in breast MRI based on supervised and unsupervised learning

Abstract: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has become an important tool in breast cancer diagnosis, but evaluation of multitemporal 3D image data holds new challenges for human observers. To aid the image analysis process, we apply supervised and unsupervised pattern recognition techniques for computing enhanced visualizations of suspicious lesions in breast MRI data. These techniques represent an important component of future sophisticated computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems and support… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,15,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Automated CADe approaches usually exploit the fact that malignant lesions typically have different signal intensity kinetic profiles on DCE-MRI compared to normal parenchyma. [13][14][15][16][17][18]29,30 Some of these methods have been shown to have a detection accuracy comparable to manual detection. [13][14][15][16][17][18]29,30 However, a CADx system assumes that the lesion detection has been solved either manually or via CADe, and it is typically comprised of two modules: (1) a quantitative feature extractor and (2) a classifier that employs the attributes extracted from the lesion to discriminate lesion classes.…”
Section: Previous Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13,15,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Automated CADe approaches usually exploit the fact that malignant lesions typically have different signal intensity kinetic profiles on DCE-MRI compared to normal parenchyma. [13][14][15][16][17][18]29,30 Some of these methods have been shown to have a detection accuracy comparable to manual detection. [13][14][15][16][17][18]29,30 However, a CADx system assumes that the lesion detection has been solved either manually or via CADe, and it is typically comprised of two modules: (1) a quantitative feature extractor and (2) a classifier that employs the attributes extracted from the lesion to discriminate lesion classes.…”
Section: Previous Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18]29,30 Some of these methods have been shown to have a detection accuracy comparable to manual detection. [13][14][15][16][17][18]29,30 However, a CADx system assumes that the lesion detection has been solved either manually or via CADe, and it is typically comprised of two modules: (1) a quantitative feature extractor and (2) a classifier that employs the attributes extracted from the lesion to discriminate lesion classes. Several different CADx classifiers for DCE-MRI have been proposed including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), 17 artificial neural networks, 6,15,19,20 and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers.…”
Section: Previous Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Supervised learning techniques have been applied to breast MRI data in multiple studies [6,[11][12][13]. Previous work in the scientific literature on assessing the vascular heterogeneity of breast cancer from MRI examinations has involved the use of co-occurrence matrix texture analysis [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supervised pattern recognition refers to the techniques with the priori knowledge about the category membership of samples used for the classification (Berrueta et al 2007;Twellmanna et al 2008). The identification model is developed on a training set of samples within categories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%