2022
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2021.3135569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Free Safety-Critical Control for Robotic Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the results in Theorem 3.1, safety can be ensure when the convergence rate of the approximate solution u to the optimal u * is faster than the pre-defined allowable rate of change in CBF constraints. This is consistent with the conditions of safe tracking controller in [35]. The following statement presents the safety criteria for bounded c and the biased approximate solutions.…”
Section: B Safety and Robustness Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the results in Theorem 3.1, safety can be ensure when the convergence rate of the approximate solution u to the optimal u * is faster than the pre-defined allowable rate of change in CBF constraints. This is consistent with the conditions of safe tracking controller in [35]. The following statement presents the safety criteria for bounded c and the biased approximate solutions.…”
Section: B Safety and Robustness Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…While the dynamic controller approximates the time-varying optimal solutions of problem (5) in an exponential rate, it is not sufficient to guarantee the safety of the systems yet. An illustrative experiment on how an exponentially tracking controller may break the safety constraints can be found in [35]. Besides, the ubiquitous disturbances and modeling errors require a robust algorithm.…”
Section: B Safety and Robustness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, our total parameter vector θ ∈ Θ = [−1, 2] 8 . Then, our verification problem is very similar to that which we had for the robotarium -see if the quadruped coupled with the controller in [31] can keep positive this candidate barrier function h for at least K = 150 time-steps with ∆t = 0.1.…”
Section: B Hardware Verification With Limited Datamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this section, we will verify two hardware systems, the Robotarium, and the Unitree A1 Quadruped steered by a variant of the controller presented in [31]. The robotarium experiments will provide further numerical validation of our scenario approach to verification.…”
Section: B Hardware Verification With Limited Datamentioning
confidence: 99%