2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2364666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for the thickness dependence of electron concentration in InN films

Abstract: A model for the influence of different contributions to the high electron concentration in dependence on the film thickness of state-of-the-art InN layers grown by molecular-beam epitaxy is proposed. Surface accumulation has a crucial influence for InN layers <300nm and superimposes the background concentration. For air-exposed InN, it can be assigned to a surface near doping by oxygen. For InN layers in the micron range the density of dislocations is the major doping mechanism. Finally, point defects s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, oxide interfaces offer potential for the realisation of a variety of novel physical phenomena and conductivities that differ drastically to those in the bulk of the material. In addition to these "designer" interface 2DEGs, we note here that, in the similar material InN, dislocations that are generated at the InN/substrate (or buffer layer) interface have been reported to be a source of n-type conductivity, causing an unintentional increase in electron density approaching the interface [120,[152][153][154]. Given the propensity for donor-like defects and impurities in TCOs, it seems plausible that a similar effect could occur at a latticemismatched TCO/substrate interface.…”
Section: Surface Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, oxide interfaces offer potential for the realisation of a variety of novel physical phenomena and conductivities that differ drastically to those in the bulk of the material. In addition to these "designer" interface 2DEGs, we note here that, in the similar material InN, dislocations that are generated at the InN/substrate (or buffer layer) interface have been reported to be a source of n-type conductivity, causing an unintentional increase in electron density approaching the interface [120,[152][153][154]. Given the propensity for donor-like defects and impurities in TCOs, it seems plausible that a similar effect could occur at a latticemismatched TCO/substrate interface.…”
Section: Surface Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and Table I). It has been argued in the literature that either dislocations 63,64 or H and O impurities, 16,17,65 are most likely the sources of the unintentional n-type conductivity in as-grown InN. However, usually the edge type dislocations have been considered when no correlation between free electron concentration and the dislocation densities is reported.…”
Section: Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that dislocations act as donors and may indeed act as junction shunts in these materials as well, providing a plausible explanation for why the depletion region fails to fully isolate the p-type bulk from the n-type surface layer [17,27,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Baars Et Al Use a Parallel Conduction Model In Which The Obmentioning
confidence: 99%