2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model evaluation of plant metal content and biomass yield for the phytoextraction of heavy metals by switchgrass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although other models obviate many of the fundamental processes of metal uptake, some mathematical models are useful for providing information important to the planning and implementation of phytoremediation tasks at the industrial level and for assessing the potential of the plant species used, including economic aspects, for example, the cost and number of harvest cycles that would be needed to reduce the con-centration of a metal in the soil to an optimum (Thomas et al 2005), the identification of the time and concentration conditions for phytoextraction purposes (Gonnelli et al 2000), the number of years for the decontamination of each metal in a multi-contaminated soil (Jankaite 2009), and the maximum metal content in the biomass yield (Chen et al 2012). …”
Section: Predictive Models Of Optimal Metal Removal Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other models obviate many of the fundamental processes of metal uptake, some mathematical models are useful for providing information important to the planning and implementation of phytoremediation tasks at the industrial level and for assessing the potential of the plant species used, including economic aspects, for example, the cost and number of harvest cycles that would be needed to reduce the con-centration of a metal in the soil to an optimum (Thomas et al 2005), the identification of the time and concentration conditions for phytoextraction purposes (Gonnelli et al 2000), the number of years for the decontamination of each metal in a multi-contaminated soil (Jankaite 2009), and the maximum metal content in the biomass yield (Chen et al 2012). …”
Section: Predictive Models Of Optimal Metal Removal Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the Cd concentrations in shoots were 8.62 lg g À1 for 'Alamo', 8.38 lg g À1 for 'Cave-in-Rock' under 10 lmol L À1 CdCl 2 condition (Figure 2c). Chen et al (2012) reported that it was practicable to use switchgrass for phytoextraction of Cr and zinc (Zn) in situ based on hydroponic culture because of the well-known agronomic characteristics and high biomass of the plant. The minimum concentration in the shoots of Cd hyperaccumulator was 100 lg g À1 (Wei et al 2012), thus two tested cultivars of switchgrass could not be considered as Cd hyperaccumulators, but they may act as Cd-accumulators because of large Cd accumulation in root, especially in roots of 'Cave-in-Rock', in which over 440 lg g À1 Cd was accumulated ( Figure 2a).…”
Section: Effects Of CD Treatment On Cd Accumulation and Translocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two elements deactivated enzymes linked to the synthesis or restitution of GSH, which is considered the most active non-enzymatic antioxidant in plants exposed to metals, decreasing biomass production by plants (NOCTOR et al, 2011). Exposure of some genera of forage grasses to Cd and As caused reductions in dry mass production of over 80% (SOLEIMANI et al, 2010;CHEN et al, 2012;PIRES et al, 2013;ZHANG et al, 2014a). These metals also deactivate enzymes bound to the synthesis or restoration of GSH, but for some plants groups this occurs less effectively compared with Cr and Pb (NOCTOR et al, 2011).…”
Section: Effect Of Heavy Metals On Biomass Production and Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the use of forage grasses for phytoremediation 3 of heavy metals has increased considerably in recent years, as these plants show rapid growth, an extensive root system (which increases the uptake of heavy metals), and elevated dry mass production (CHEN et al, 2012;GILABEL et al, 2014;LAMBRECHTS et al, 2014). However, few studies with these plants have reported the effect of heavy metals on the uptake of micronutrients and on the activity of enzymes of the antioxidant system, which are essential processes for the growth of plants, especially in contaminated environments (KOPITTKE et al, 2010a;LI et al, 2012).…”
Section: Soil Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%