2008
DOI: 10.1134/s0010952508040114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model estimations of possible climatic changes in 21st century at different scenarios of solar and volcanic activities and anthropogenic impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same applies to WDR and SDR, but the follows the recovery of grand solar minimum. We call the scenarios "weak" and "strong" for clear distinction, though it must be noted that both scenarios actually represent stronger irradiance reductions than those generally assumed in previous studies (Chiodo et al, 2016;Ineson et al, 2015;IPCC, 2013;Maycock et al, 2015;Meehl et al, 2013;Mokhov et al, 2008). Previous estimates regarding the TSI decrease during the Maunder Minimum compared to present-day values range from somewhere close to present 11-year solar minima (Schrijver et al, 2011), to reductions of 0.15 to 0.3 % below present solar minima (Foukal et al, 2011) all the way to more than 0.4 % below present solar minima derived by Shapiro et al (2011) and applied here in the SD and SDR scenarios.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same applies to WDR and SDR, but the follows the recovery of grand solar minimum. We call the scenarios "weak" and "strong" for clear distinction, though it must be noted that both scenarios actually represent stronger irradiance reductions than those generally assumed in previous studies (Chiodo et al, 2016;Ineson et al, 2015;IPCC, 2013;Maycock et al, 2015;Meehl et al, 2013;Mokhov et al, 2008). Previous estimates regarding the TSI decrease during the Maunder Minimum compared to present-day values range from somewhere close to present 11-year solar minima (Schrijver et al, 2011), to reductions of 0.15 to 0.3 % below present solar minima (Foukal et al, 2011) all the way to more than 0.4 % below present solar minima derived by Shapiro et al (2011) and applied here in the SD and SDR scenarios.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies were conducted to assess if a potential future grand solar minimum would lead to a possible reduction in the projected global warming. Mokhov et al (2008) performed 21st century simulations with different solar, volcanic and anthropogenic forcings. Their analysis of the response of global mean nearsurface temperature to various solar scenarios showed that solar activity variations of up to 2 W m −2 impose only small changes in the surface temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call the scenarios "weak" and "strong" for clear distinction, though it must be noted that both scenarios actually represent stronger irradiance reductions than those generally assumed previous studies Maycock et al, 2015;Meehl et al, 2013;Mokhov et al, 2008) and by the IPCC. As described by Meehl et al (2013), previous estimates regarding the TSI decrease during the Maunder Minimum compared to present-day values range from somewhere close to present 11-year solar minima, to reductions of 0.15% to 0.3% below present solar minima all 5 the way to more than 0.4% below present solar minima derived by Shapiro et al (2011) and applied here in the SD and SDR scenarios.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A number of studies were conducted to estimate if a potential future grand solar minimum would slow or even cancel global warming. Mokhov et al (2008) performed 21 st century simulations with different solar, volcanic and anthropogenic forcings. Their analysis of the response of global mean near-20 surface temperature to various solar scenarios showed that solar activity variations of up to 2 W/m 2 impose only small changes in the surface temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the coupled chemistry-climate model SOCOL3-MPIOM (Stenke et al, 2013;Muthers et al, 2014), which consists of the atmospheric model coupled to the chemistry module and the ocean model. The atmospheric component is a general circulation model ECHAM5.4, a spectral model based on primitive equations with temperature, vorticity, divergence, surface pressure, humidity and cloud water as prognostic variables (Manzini et al, 2006;Roeckner, 2003;Roeckner et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%