2014
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2012.2226594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Driven Safety Analysis of Closed-Loop Medical Systems

Abstract: In modern hospitals, patients are treated using a wide array of medical devices that are increasingly interacting with each other over the network, thus offering a perfect example of a cyber-physical system. We study the safety of a medical device system for the physiologic closed-loop control of drug infusion. The main contribution of the paper is the verification approach for the safety properties of closed-loop medical device systems. We demonstrate, using a case study, that the approach can be applied to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Real medical devices exhibit continuous time behavior, and the ability to capture real-time behavior is critical if we want to apply our approach to real medical systems. For example, the ondemand medical systems described in [3,26,18] all rely on`timeout' behavior in the medical devices to guarantee system safety in the presence of inter-device communications failures. Additionally, many medical devices exhibit continuous behavior in terms of their interactions with the patient.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Real medical devices exhibit continuous time behavior, and the ability to capture real-time behavior is critical if we want to apply our approach to real medical systems. For example, the ondemand medical systems described in [3,26,18] all rely on`timeout' behavior in the medical devices to guarantee system safety in the presence of inter-device communications failures. Additionally, many medical devices exhibit continuous behavior in terms of their interactions with the patient.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While PCA lets patients manage their own pain-levels e ectively [15] it also creates an opportunity for overdose. Opiod [26,19].…”
Section: Motivating Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closed loop system considered a highly abstract PCA pump [21] and was modeled as a timed automaton in UPPAAL [1] whereas the GPCA discussed in this paper is a detailed model of a realistic infusion pump with rich functionality captured in AGREE and Simulink/Stateflow. To demonstrate that the GPCA satisfies the closed loop real-time safety requirements, it is necessary to demonstrate that the GPCA (expressed in AGREE) satisfies the PCA requirement (captured in UPPAAL).…”
Section: Verification In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model also includes an automaton representing patient physiology, an automaton for the pulse oximeter, an automaton capturing the logic of the safety interface, and a network automaton. For details of the model, we refer the reader to [23].…”
Section: Closed Loop System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In prior works [23,21], we have separately and independently described two approaches to respectively verify (i) safety properties of the closed-loop system using timed automata models in UPPAAL that included a physiological model of the patient in the loop, and (ii) critical requirements of the infusion pump control software using a compositional assume-guarantee reasoning approach on an AADL system architecture with component behaviors elaborated in Simulink/Stateflow models. A natural question then is whether these two can be combined in some meaningful way such that the particular infusion pump when used as part of closedloop system can be guaranteed to uphold critical safety properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%