2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model driven reconstruction of roofs from sparse LIDAR point clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
94
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the promising ways to address this issue is to introduce some tags for storing the information of roofs and windows (e.g., shape, materials) and to define certain rules for transforming the semantics information to 3D geometries. Another possible way is to use footprints to detect and reconstruct the building structures (Dehbi et al, 2016;Henn et al, 2013). Furthermore, due to the limitation of the visualization tool we used, the building parts that are underground are not visualized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the promising ways to address this issue is to introduce some tags for storing the information of roofs and windows (e.g., shape, materials) and to define certain rules for transforming the semantics information to 3D geometries. Another possible way is to use footprints to detect and reconstruct the building structures (Dehbi et al, 2016;Henn et al, 2013). Furthermore, due to the limitation of the visualization tool we used, the building parts that are underground are not visualized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these studies, model-driven methods assume a building is an assembly of roof primitives (e.g., gable roof and hipped roof), which and whose topology are predefined in a model library (Tarsha-Kurdi et al, 2007). To extract roof primitives from LiDAR point clouds, techniques such as invariant moments (Maas and Vosselman, 1999), graph matching (Oude Elberink and Vosselman, 2009;Verma et al, 2006;Xiong et al, 2014), Support Vector Machine (SVM) (Henn et al, 2013;Satari et al, 2012), RANdom SAmple Consensus (RANSAC) (Henn et al, 2013) and Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo (RJMCMC) (Huang et al, 2013) are used. However, these approaches tend to fail when reconstructing complex roof shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To alleviate this problem, complex roof shapes are usually decomposed into simple ones that are defined in the model library (Kada and McKinley, 2009). Among the reported studies, 2D-plans (Henn et al, 2013;Kada and McKinley, 2009), graph matching technique (Oude Elberink and Vosselman, 2009;Verma et al, 2006;Xiong et al, 2014) and convexity analysis (Lin et al, 2013) are used for this purpose. Unlike the aforementioned approaches, Huang et al (2013) extract roof primitives one by one from LiDAR points by using the RJMCMC technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for building detection or extraction from ALS data can be grouped into the following categories: building detection (Matikainen et al, 2003;Tóvari and Vögtle, 2004;TarshaKurdi et al, 2006), building roof contour extraction (Sampath and Shan, 2007;Wei, 2008;Perera et. al 2012), building roof extraction (Rottensteiner et al, 2005;Sampath and Shan, 2010), and building model extraction (Henn et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%