2015 Ieee Sensors 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icsens.2015.7370258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based rendezvous calibration of mobile sensor networks for monitoring air quality

Abstract: Abstract-Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) hold the potential to constitute a real game changer for our understanding of urban air pollution, through a significant augmentation of spatial resolution in measurement. However, temporal drift, crosssensitivity and effects caused by varying environmental conditions (e.g., temperature) in low-cost chemical sensors (typically used in mobile WSNs) pose a tough challenge for reliable calibration. Based on state-of-the-art rendezvous calibration methods, we propose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tsujita et al [50] installed a low-cost NO 2 sensor in the city of Tokyo, Japan. They recognize that the major error source of their sensor appears to be baseline drift of the calibration [76] Linear Mobile Saukh et al [77] Linear Mobile Saukh et al [78] Linear Mobile Maag et al [79] Linear Mobile Budde et al [80] Linear Mobile Fu et al [81] Linear Mobile Markert et al [82] Linear Mobile Kizel et al [34] Linear Mobile Arfire et al [83] Non-Linear Mobile…”
Section: A Blind Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tsujita et al [50] installed a low-cost NO 2 sensor in the city of Tokyo, Japan. They recognize that the major error source of their sensor appears to be baseline drift of the calibration [76] Linear Mobile Saukh et al [77] Linear Mobile Saukh et al [78] Linear Mobile Maag et al [79] Linear Mobile Budde et al [80] Linear Mobile Fu et al [81] Linear Mobile Markert et al [82] Linear Mobile Kizel et al [34] Linear Mobile Arfire et al [83] Non-Linear Mobile…”
Section: A Blind Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever a mobile low-cost sensor is in a sensor rendezvous with a highly accurate sensor, e.g., from a governmental monitoring site, the low-cost sensor can use the reference measurement for calibration [78]. Arfire et al [83] apply a non-linear temperature correction for mobile electrochemical sensors in a collaborative fashion with a reference sensor. Hasenfratz et al [76] present three different calibration methods based on weighted least squares that also incorporate the age of measurement at the time of the calibration parameter calculations.…”
Section: B Collaborative Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be for two reasons: (i) the larger distance between tram-track and monitoring station, and (ii) the location of site SCH at a crossroad, where traffic flow is controlled by traffic lights and therefore, a larger short-term variability of NO 2 is expected. From a more general perspective, this is of importance when mobile sensor data is corrected based on data from nearby fixed reference sites, as suggested by Arfire et al (2015) and Saukh et al (2015). The parameters for data correction as determined from such an approach depend on the local concentration variability and the time response of the sensor and the reference instrument.…”
Section: Tram Based No 2 Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When radiation changes after the coupling phase, the correction co-efficient does not fit the situation anymore and causes larger errors. However, as point (n) indicates, there is no clear difference between stations with open (Stations 1-5) and slightly obscuring surroundings (Stations [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In December, there are no significant differences between RMSE values at different station groups due to the low intensity of the SW radiation.…”
Section: Station Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic calibration methods are thus used to eliminate the cumbersome and error-prone manual calibration [8]. One such automatic calibration method is the rendezvous model [9][10][11][12]. In the rendezvous model, observations by two or more sensors, mobile or stationary, are collected when the sensors are co-located, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%