2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39402-7_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Pose Estimation for Rigid Objects

Abstract: Abstract. Determining the pose of objects appearing in images is a problem encountered often in several practical applications. The most effective strategy for dealing with this challenge is to proceed according to the model-based paradigm, which involves building 3D models of objects and then determining object poses by fitting their models to new images with the aid of detected features. This paper proposes a model-based approach for estimating the full pose of known objects from natural point features. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the detection of particular markers in an image combined with the knowledge of their physical location on the turntable provided a set of 2D-3D correspondences. These were used to estimate the camera pose in the turntable coordinate system by robustly solving the PnP problem and then refining the estimated 6D pose by non-linearly minimizing the cumulative re-projection error with the posest library from [31]. The root mean square re-projection error, which was calculated at marker corners in all test images, is 1.27 px for Carmine, 1.37 px for Kinect, and 1.50 px for Canon.…”
Section: Calibration Of Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the detection of particular markers in an image combined with the knowledge of their physical location on the turntable provided a set of 2D-3D correspondences. These were used to estimate the camera pose in the turntable coordinate system by robustly solving the PnP problem and then refining the estimated 6D pose by non-linearly minimizing the cumulative re-projection error with the posest library from [31]. The root mean square re-projection error, which was calculated at marker corners in all test images, is 1.27 px for Carmine, 1.37 px for Kinect, and 1.50 px for Canon.…”
Section: Calibration Of Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem, also known as the PnP or camera resection problem, 8 has received much attention due to is applicability in various domains. Exterior orientation is typically dealt with by embedding minimalsize PnP solvers to robust regression frameworks such as RANSAC (see [38] and references therein). However, as minimal solutions ignore much of the redundancy present in the data, they suffer from inaccuracies.…”
Section: Exterior Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as minimal solutions ignore much of the redundancy present in the data, they suffer from inaccuracies. To remedy this, an additional step comprised of nonlinear optimization with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm is employed to minimize the reprojection error pertaining to all inliers [38].…”
Section: Exterior Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimization is made more immune to noise caused by mislocalized image points by substituting the squared reprojection error with a robust cost function (i.e., M-estimator). Our pose estimation approach is detailed in [10].…”
Section: Scale Estimation From Known Object Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%