2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40261-6_60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Scale Factor Estimation in 3D Reconstruction

Abstract: Abstract.A well-known ambiguity in monocular structure from motion estimation is that 3D reconstruction is possible up to a similarity transformation, i.e. an isometry composed with isotropic scaling. To raise this ambiguity, it is commonly suggested to manually measure an absolute distance in the environment and then use it to scale a reconstruction accordingly. In practice, however, it is often the case that such a measurement cannot be performed with sufficient accuracy, compromising certain uses of a 3D re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the approach used, the 3-D model can be in the form of an unordered set of points (i.e., point cloud) and their image descriptors, a wireframe, or a polygon mesh. Use of a properly scaled model helps to resolve the well-known depth/scale ambiguity [25]. Monocular approaches infer pose by matching features detected in an image with the model.…”
Section: A Monocular Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the approach used, the 3-D model can be in the form of an unordered set of points (i.e., point cloud) and their image descriptors, a wireframe, or a polygon mesh. Use of a properly scaled model helps to resolve the well-known depth/scale ambiguity [25]. Monocular approaches infer pose by matching features detected in an image with the model.…”
Section: A Monocular Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the FPA model was reconstructed only using optical images acquired by a monocular camera, the scale of the resulting model is ambiguous, i.e., estimated parameters can be multiplied with an arbitrary factor and still produce equal projections of the model on the images (Lourakis and Zabulis, 2013;Hartley and Zisserman, 2003). In order to obtain a proper scale of the model, images containing laser beams projected on the surface of the scene can be used through one of our proposed methods.…”
Section: Real Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When performing the reconstruction, this results in scale ambiguity, i.e. the estimated parameters of 3D structure and camera trajectory can be multiplied with an arbitrary factor and still give rise to the same image observations (Lourakis and Zabulis, 2013;Hartley and Zisserman, 2003). This also precludes or at least limits the possibility to conduct quantitative measurements based on geometric parameters (e.g., distances, areas, angles, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard practice for estimating the scale factor is to manually measure the distance between two points in the scene and use this reference measurement to scale the reconstruction accordingly. The automation of this process has been studied in several papers such as [123][124][125] by considering a known motion or an object with known dimensions. The use of additional sensor data such as laser readings, GPS, inertial measurement units, gyroscope and accelerometer, etc.…”
Section: Scale Factor Estimation In Monocular Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%