2014
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2013.2282370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Dual-Energy X-Ray CT Using a Joint Quadratic Likelihood Model

Abstract: Dual-energy X-ray CT (DECT) has the potential to improve contrast and reduce artifacts as compared to traditional CT. Moreover, by applying model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) to dual-energy data, one might also expect to reduce noise and improve resolution. However, the direct implementation of dual-energy MBIR requires the use of a nonlinear forward model, which increases both complexity and computation. Alternatively, simplified forward models have been used which treat the material-decomposed chann… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods in the post-log category can leverage existing pre-correction steps used by FBP reconstruction, and the numerical optimization of the WLS cost function is relatively straightforward. Post-log statistical models are widely encountered in CT MBIR literature and have been implemented with various optimization methods [14]–[20], regularization methods [21]–[23], applied to dual-energy CT [24], [25], interior tomography [26], and combined with data-driven prior information [27]–[29]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods in the post-log category can leverage existing pre-correction steps used by FBP reconstruction, and the numerical optimization of the WLS cost function is relatively straightforward. Post-log statistical models are widely encountered in CT MBIR literature and have been implemented with various optimization methods [14]–[20], regularization methods [21]–[23], applied to dual-energy CT [24], [25], interior tomography [26], and combined with data-driven prior information [27]–[29]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, many considerable efforts to suppress noise-induced artifacts in DECT images and material-decomposed images have been reported (Rutherford et al 1976, Kalender et al 1988, Warp et al 2003, Leng et al 2011, Zeng et al 2016a, Niu et al 2014, Clark et al 2014, Dong et al 2014, Sukovic et al 2000, Petrongolo et al 2015, Zhang et al 2014, Long et al 2014, Zhang et al 2016a, Zhang et al 2016b, Szczykutowicz et al 2011, Liu et al 2016). Among them, projection or image domain denoising approaches were proposed to improve low-dose DECT images quality (Rutherford et al 1976, Kalender et al 1988, Warp et al 2003, Leng et al 2011, Zeng et al 2016a, Niu et al 2014, Clark et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these approaches can suppress the noise to some extent, they often result in spatial resolution loss because the noise in DECT images does not obey a uniform distribution. By better modeling the projection data and the image geometry in the DECT imaging, statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) algorithms have shown to be more robust than FBP algorithm in regard to the presence of noise-induced artifacts (Dong et al 2014, Sukovic et al 2000, Petrongolo et al 2015, Zhang et al 2014, Long et al 2014, Zhang et al 2016a, Szczykutowicz et al 2011, Liu et al 2016). Based on the maximum a posterior (MAP) estimation criteria, the SIR algorithms can be mathematically formulated with a cost function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternate approach to improving reconstruction quality is to use more advanced model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) methods, which are based on the estimation of a reconstruction which best fits models of both the sensor measurements (i.e., the forward model) and the object (i.e., prior model) [5], [28]- [30]. These 3D reconstruction methods have been shown to be very effective when the angular range is limited [31] and also when the number of views is less than that required by Nyquist sampling criterion [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%