2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative reconstruction for dual energy CT with an average image-induced nonlocal means regularization

Abstract: Reducing radiation dose in dual energy computed tomography (DECT) is highly desirable but it may lead to excessive noise in the filtered backprojection (FBP) reconstructed DECT images, which can inevitably increase the diagnostic uncertainty. To obtain clinically acceptable DECT images from low-mAs acquisitions, in this work we develop a novel scheme based on measurement of DECT data. In this scheme, inspired by the success of edge-preserving non-local means (NLM) filtering in CT imaging and the intrinsic char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(C)). As comparisons, we also implement the image-based method, empirical dual energy calibration (EDEC) method (Stenner et al, 2007), nonlocal means filter based (NLM) method (Zeng et al, 2016b), weighted least square and nonlocal means based (WLS-NLM) method (Zhang et al, 2017), material decomposition from inconsistent rays (MDIR) (Maaβ et al, 2009b), and E-SART method (Zhao et al, 2015, Hu et al, 2016), covering all the decomposition categories and including both conventional and state-of-the-art methods. The corresponding descriptions and comparisons are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3(C)). As comparisons, we also implement the image-based method, empirical dual energy calibration (EDEC) method (Stenner et al, 2007), nonlocal means filter based (NLM) method (Zeng et al, 2016b), weighted least square and nonlocal means based (WLS-NLM) method (Zhang et al, 2017), material decomposition from inconsistent rays (MDIR) (Maaβ et al, 2009b), and E-SART method (Zhao et al, 2015, Hu et al, 2016), covering all the decomposition categories and including both conventional and state-of-the-art methods. The corresponding descriptions and comparisons are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the combination of polychromatic projections requires satisfying a geometrical consistency. Several iterative methods are proposed based on statistical models and nonlinear optimizations (Elbakri and Fessler, 2002, Xu et al, 2009, Maaβ et al, 2009b, Niu et al, 2014, Zeng et al, 2016b, Zhang et al, 2017, Zhang et al, 2014). By introducing prior knowledge or establishing an approximate model, these methods improve the decomposed image quality effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to reconstruction methods a novel scheme based on measurement of DECT data has been advanced in order to attain clinically satisfactory DECT images from low-mAs acquisitions. In this scheme, enthused by the success of edge-preserving nonlocal means (NLM) filtering in CT imaging and the inherent features underlying DECT images, i.e., global correlation and nonlocal similarity, an averaged image induced NLM-based (aviNLM) regularization is combined into the penalized weighted least-squares (PWLS) framework [22]. More prominently, it provides the best qualitative outcomes with the premium details and the fewest noise-induced artifacts, due to the aviNLM regularization learned from DECT images [22].…”
Section: Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By assuming that X-ray photons follow a Poisson distribution on reaching an X-ray detector, the MAP model can be reduced to a penalized weighted least squares (PWLS) optimization, including a term relating to the prior distribution of the target images [17], [20]. Owing to the difficulty in calculating the prior distribution, alternative priors reflecting the spatial correlation among neighboring pixels, such as total variation (TV) [6], [23], fractional-order TV [25], nonlocal TV [18], Markov random fields theory [17], [20], [21], or nonlocal means (NLM) [3], [10], [12], [26], have been imposed onto the target image. Although the IR method improves the overall image quality, some issues remain to be solved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%