2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.06.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based high-throughput design of ion exchange protein chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two participants tied for the position of the third‐most‐successful approach. One adapted the methodology presented in Khalaf et al (2016), which begins with the mass balance on a component i on a chromatography column using a lumped kinetic model described in Equations (11) and (12): Mobilenormal−phase.25emMBcit=usfdax,iεi2cix2usfεicixtrue(1εiεitrue)qit. Solidnormal−phase.25emMBqit=km,i(qieqqi).where c i and q i are the mobile and solid‐phase concentrations as a function of time t and distance along the column x; d ax,i , k m,i , ε i , and q i eq are the axial dispersion coefficient, the lumped mass transfer coefficient, the accessible porosity and the equilibrium solid phase concentration (each for the component i ); and u sf is the superficial velocity of the mobile phase. With differential Equations (11) and (12), the concentration of any component (buffer, salt, protein) can be simulated at any position in the column and at any time.…”
Section: Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two participants tied for the position of the third‐most‐successful approach. One adapted the methodology presented in Khalaf et al (2016), which begins with the mass balance on a component i on a chromatography column using a lumped kinetic model described in Equations (11) and (12): Mobilenormal−phase.25emMBcit=usfdax,iεi2cix2usfεicixtrue(1εiεitrue)qit. Solidnormal−phase.25emMBqit=km,i(qieqqi).where c i and q i are the mobile and solid‐phase concentrations as a function of time t and distance along the column x; d ax,i , k m,i , ε i , and q i eq are the axial dispersion coefficient, the lumped mass transfer coefficient, the accessible porosity and the equilibrium solid phase concentration (each for the component i ); and u sf is the superficial velocity of the mobile phase. With differential Equations (11) and (12), the concentration of any component (buffer, salt, protein) can be simulated at any position in the column and at any time.…”
Section: Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third‐most‐successful approach was as follows: with the pH and ionic strength known, the charge of the protein is calculated (at infinite dilution) based on the number of surface‐exposed amino acids. This is done using modified forms of equations reported elsewhere (Guélat et al, 2012; Guélat, Khalaf, Lattuada, Costioli, & Morbidelli, 2016; Guélat, Ströhlein, Lattuada, & Morbidelli, 2010; Khalaf et al, 2016).…”
Section: Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanistic models of the various chromatography systems, such as ion exchange, hydrophobic interaction, and a nity, have been extensively published for process development [105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114]. Also, reversed phase chromatography and the separation of insulin on RPC have been modeled to evaluate column material, bu ers and temperature e ects [115][116][117].…”
Section: Mechanistic Model-based Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separations with three or more similar compounds in the feed are often complex and therefore typically require considerably more optimization than the initial mAb capture step. Examples of such process development efforts to achieve sufficient clearance from antibody aggregates are reported in the literature; examples of ternary separations involving aggregates as well as other product‐related impurities are less frequent . Other examples of ternary mixtures comprising non‐mAb proteins, namely BSA, ovalbumin, cytochrome C, and ribonuclease A, are commonly employed to study model‐based optimization problems …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such process development efforts to achieve sufficient clearance from antibody aggregates are reported in the literature [1][2][3][4][5] ; examples of ternary separations involving aggregates as well as other product-related impurities are less frequent. [6][7][8][9] Other examples of ternary mixtures comprising non-mAb proteins, namely BSA, ovalbumin, cytochrome C, and ribonuclease A, are commonly employed to study model-based optimization problems. [10][11][12] Finding optimal operating conditions for chromatographic separations is a complex optimization problem which needs to consider multiple inputs and multiple objectives to ultimately deliver a robust and economic process that produces drugs of the highest quality and safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%