The development of purification processes for protein biopharmaceuticals is challenging due to compressed development timelines, long experimental times, and the need to survey a large parameter space. Typical methods for development of a chromatography step evaluate several dozen chromatographic column runs to optimize the conditions. An efficient batch-binding method of screening chromatographic purification conditions in a 96-well format with a robotic liquid-handling system is described and evaluated. The system dispenses slurries of chromatographic resins into filter plates, which are then equilibrated, loaded with protein, washed and eluted. This paper evaluates factors influencing the performance of this high-throughput screening technique, including the reproducibility of the aliquotted resin volume, the contact time of the solution and resin during mixing, and the volume of liquid carried over in the resin bed after centrifugal evacuation. These factors led to the optimization of a batch-binding technique utilizing either 50 or 100 mL of resin in each well, the selection of an industrially relevant incubation time of 20 min, and the quantitation of the holdup volume, which was as much as one quarter of the total volume added to each well. The results from the batchbinding method compared favorably to chromatographic column separation steps for a cGMP protein purification process utilizing both hydrophobic interaction and anionexchange steps. These high-throughput screening tools can be combined with additional studies on the kinetics and thermodynamics of protein-resin interactions to provide fundamental information which is useful for defining and optimizing chromatographic separations steps.
Achievement of a robust and scalable cell retention device remains a challenge in perfusion systems. Of the two filtration systems commonly used, tangential flow filtration (TFF) systems often have an inferior product sieving profile compared to alternating tangential flow filtration (ATF) systems, which is typically attributed to the ATF's unique alternating flow. Here, we demonstrate that observed performance differences between the two systems are a function of cell lysis and not the alternating flow as previously thought. The peristaltic pump used in typical TFF perfusion systems is shown to be the single major contributor to shear stress and cell lysis. Replacing the peristaltic pump with a low shear centrifugal pump brought cell growth, cell lysis, particle concentration, and product sieving in a TFF perfusion system to levels comparable with that of an ATF. These results provide a correlation where poor product sieving can be partially explained by high shear in cell retention systems and demonstrate that low shear TFF systems are a feasible alternative to ATF systems.
This paper presents a systems approach to evaluating the potential of integrated continuous bioprocessing for monoclonal antibody (mAb) manufacture across a product's lifecycle from preclinical to commercial manufacture. The economic, operational, and environmental feasibility of alternative continuous manufacturing strategies were evaluated holistically using a prototype UCL decisional tool that integrated process economics, discrete‐event simulation, environmental impact analysis, operational risk analysis, and multiattribute decision‐making. The case study focused on comparing whole bioprocesses that used either batch, continuous or a hybrid combination of batch and continuous technologies for cell culture, capture chromatography, and polishing chromatography steps. The cost of goods per gram (COG/g), E‐factor, and operational risk scores of each strategy were established across a matrix of scenarios with differing combinations of clinical development phase and company portfolio size. The tool outputs predict that the optimal strategy for early phase production and small/medium‐sized companies is the integrated continuous strategy (alternating tangential flow filtration (ATF) perfusion, continuous capture, continuous polishing). However, the top ranking strategy changes for commercial production and companies with large portfolios to the hybrid strategy with fed‐batch culture, continuous capture and batch polishing from a COG/g perspective. The multiattribute decision‐making analysis highlighted that if the operational feasibility was considered more important than the economic benefits, the hybrid strategy would be preferred for all company scales. Further considerations outside the scope of this work include the process development costs required to adopt continuous processing. © 2017 The Authors Biotechnology Progress published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 33:854–866, 2017
Weak partitioning chromatography (WPC) is an isocratic chromatographic protein separation method performed under mobile phase conditions where a significant amount of the product protein binds to the resin, well in excess of typical flowthrough operations. The more stringent load and wash conditions lead to improved removal of more tightly binding impurities, although at the cost of a reduction in step yield. The step yield can be restored by extending the column load and incorporating a short wash at the end of the load stage. The use of WPC with anion exchange resins enables a two-column cGMP purification platform to be used for many different mAbs. The operating window for WPC can be easily established using high throughput batch-binding screens. Under conditions that favor very strong product binding, competitive effects from product binding can give rise to a reduction in column loading capacity. Robust performance of WPC anion exchange chromatography has been demonstrated in multiple cGMP mAb purification processes. Excellent clearance of host cell proteins, leached Protein A, DNA, high molecular weight species, and model virus has been achieved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.