The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01830-15
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Evaluation of Higher Doses of Rifampin Using a Semimechanistic Model Incorporating Autoinduction and Saturation of Hepatic Extraction

Abstract: Rifampin is a key sterilizing drug in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). It induces its own metabolism, but neither the onset nor the extent of autoinduction has been adequately described. Currently, the World Health Organization recommends a rifampin dose of 8 to 12 mg/kg of body weight, which is believed to be suboptimal, and higher doses may potentially improve treatment outcomes. However, a nonlinear increase in exposure may be observed because of saturation of hepatic extraction and hence this should be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

7
93
4
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
93
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum predicted typical CL/F at the preinduced state was 14.9 L/h/70 kg (i.e., at 0 mg/L, Figure b ), 3.44 times higher than the typical CL/F for a concentration of, e.g., 85.8 mg/L (highest observed rifampicin concentration in the dataset). A previous model‐based estimate of k m is 3.35 mg/L, which is markedly lower than our estimate of 35.3 mg/L. The discrepancy between these estimates may exist because in contrast to the model presented here, Chirehwa et al .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum predicted typical CL/F at the preinduced state was 14.9 L/h/70 kg (i.e., at 0 mg/L, Figure b ), 3.44 times higher than the typical CL/F for a concentration of, e.g., 85.8 mg/L (highest observed rifampicin concentration in the dataset). A previous model‐based estimate of k m is 3.35 mg/L, which is markedly lower than our estimate of 35.3 mg/L. The discrepancy between these estimates may exist because in contrast to the model presented here, Chirehwa et al .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…A previous model‐based estimate of k m is 3.35 mg/L, which is markedly lower than our estimate of 35.3 mg/L. The discrepancy between these estimates may exist because in contrast to the model presented here, Chirehwa et al . assumed a well‐stirred liver model and do not include doses above 10 mg/kg.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations