1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)52738-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode of Presentation of Invasive Bladder Cancer: Reassessment of the Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
40
1
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
40
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is evident clinically as only a small proportion of patients with superficial bladder tumor had been observed to progress to invasive disease while the majority of patients with muscle-invasive cancer had reached this stage at initial clinical presentation. 13,14 This invasive behavior may be related to environmental or host factors through the process of initiation and promotion that determines the course of proliferation and hyperplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is evident clinically as only a small proportion of patients with superficial bladder tumor had been observed to progress to invasive disease while the majority of patients with muscle-invasive cancer had reached this stage at initial clinical presentation. 13,14 This invasive behavior may be related to environmental or host factors through the process of initiation and promotion that determines the course of proliferation and hyperplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 At their initial presentation, 57% of patients had de novo muscle-invasive disease. These data were compared with older series from the early 1980s by Kaye and Lange 20 and Hopkins et al, 21 which found rates of de 22 Among the 87,978 cases, the stage at diagnosis did not change significantly. In situ (Ta and Tis) cancer incidence increased by 1% per year; local disease (T1, T2a, T2b) incidence decreased by 1% annually; and advanced disease (T3a, T3b, T4, nodal and distant metastases) incidence decreased by 0.74%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The mean profile area of the 10 largest nuclei (MNA-10) found in a histological tumour section [8][9][10][11] has proved to be valuable as an independent marker for grade and prognosis. 12 In the study of Blomjous et al, 12 DNA diploid or DNA aneuploid cases (measured by flow cytometry) had nearly the same survival as MNA-10 low (< 95 µm 2 ) and MNA-10 high (> 95 µm 2 ) T A,1 tumours, respectively. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that high MNA-10 values are strongly predictive of DNA aneuploidy, which may be understandable from a cell biological point of view-many studies have shown that nuclear area strongly correlates with DNA content; thus, aneuploid cells often have larger nuclei.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%