1984
DOI: 10.1159/000272902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal Logic:A New Paradigm of Development and Late-Life Potential

Abstract: Concepts from the logic of modalities are applied to the life cycle to elaborate a new theory of adult and late-life development. Logical modalities involve what kind of truth a proposition or experience possesses. Four logical modalities are described, each governing discrete periods of life, both cognitively and emotionally. It is hypothesized that optimal development in adult life includes explicit awareness of these modalities and that such awareness is a feature of ‘wisdom’ in later life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
3

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As many remarked to us, they viewed the tasks as genuinely challenging and hoped that their performances would show that active older people could still think and reason like younger college students. While this certainly raises questions concerning the generalizability of these findings to other less able but perhaps more representative popula tions, it draws our result patterns into rather close accord with the recent views of certain writers, e.g., Chinen [1984], Kramer [1983], and Labouvie-Vief[ 1980], Chinen [1984], for example, has presented a view which suggests that our elderly subjects demonstrate what optimally can occur vis-à-vis logical reason ing rather than showing what frequently hap pens, especially when invidious age-group means contrasts are statistically present and given singular emphasis. In the latter case, the potentials of late-life development may indeed be overlooked and the plasticity of latent cognitive abilities missed if interpreted from the perspective of simplistic age decre ment life-span models.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As many remarked to us, they viewed the tasks as genuinely challenging and hoped that their performances would show that active older people could still think and reason like younger college students. While this certainly raises questions concerning the generalizability of these findings to other less able but perhaps more representative popula tions, it draws our result patterns into rather close accord with the recent views of certain writers, e.g., Chinen [1984], Kramer [1983], and Labouvie-Vief[ 1980], Chinen [1984], for example, has presented a view which suggests that our elderly subjects demonstrate what optimally can occur vis-à-vis logical reason ing rather than showing what frequently hap pens, especially when invidious age-group means contrasts are statistically present and given singular emphasis. In the latter case, the potentials of late-life development may indeed be overlooked and the plasticity of latent cognitive abilities missed if interpreted from the perspective of simplistic age decre ment life-span models.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Wisdom is conceptualized a s thought that integrates the contradictions of life and uniqueness of personal experience into a whole that allows the older adult to view herself and others in new and original ways. Further, wisdom is pragmatic, integrative cognition that allows the older individual to think and act in creative ways that pertain to his or her own life (Labouvie-Vief, 1980, 198 1 ;Chinen, 1984Chinen, , 1989. Of central concern, harkening back to the life-span developmental view of creativity, is not the "generation of all possible solutions" in life, but expertise in handling everyday, practical matters of living and being.…”
Section: Ive-smn Look?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general importance of modal thinking in accounts of cognitive develop ment is well documented [Moshman and Timmons. 1982;Chincn, 1984], Examples of modal thinking are reported by Inhelder and Piaget. For example, children in the floating bodies task are 'indifferent before contradic tions' [Inhelder and Piaget, 1958, p. 24], that is, their thinking is marked by contradictions (impossibilities).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%