2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12546-020-09247-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal lifespan and disparity at older ages by leading causes of death: a Canada-U.S. comparison

Abstract: The U.S. elderly experience shorter lifespans and greater variability in age at death than their Canadian peers. In order to gain insight on the underlying factors responsible for the Canada-U.S. old-age mortality disparities, we propose a cause-of-death analysis. Accordingly, the objective of this paper is to compare levels and trends in cause-specific modal age at death (M) and standard deviation above the mode (SD(M +)) between Canada and the U.S. since the 1970s. We focus on six broad leading causes of dea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter, also referred to as shifting mortality, has been the dominant determinant of life expectancy increase since the middle of the 21st century (Bergeron-Boucher et al 2015;Bongaarts 2009;Canudas-Romo 2008). Increases in the modal age at death are primarily driven by a decrease in mortality at older ages (Diaconu et al 2020;Horiuchi et al 2013), especially at ages above the mode (Canudas-Romo 2010), making this indicator particularly relevant for studying longevity extension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter, also referred to as shifting mortality, has been the dominant determinant of life expectancy increase since the middle of the 21st century (Bergeron-Boucher et al 2015;Bongaarts 2009;Canudas-Romo 2008). Increases in the modal age at death are primarily driven by a decrease in mortality at older ages (Diaconu et al 2020;Horiuchi et al 2013), especially at ages above the mode (Canudas-Romo 2010), making this indicator particularly relevant for studying longevity extension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%