2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-009-0360-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal identification of long-span Runyang Bridge using ambient responses recorded by SHMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Structural health monitoring system has been increasingly implemented on different kind of bridges for health monitoring all over the world: Tsing Ma Bridge (Zhang et al, 2011), Kap Shui Mun Bridge and Ting Kau Bridge (Wong, 2007), Runyang Bridge (Fei et al, 2009), Yonghe Bridge (Li et al, 2010), etc. in China, Great Belt East Bridge (Soman et al, 2018), Oresund Bridge (Peeters et al, 2009), Henrique Bridge (Magalhães et al, 2012), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Structural health monitoring system has been increasingly implemented on different kind of bridges for health monitoring all over the world: Tsing Ma Bridge (Zhang et al, 2011), Kap Shui Mun Bridge and Ting Kau Bridge (Wong, 2007), Runyang Bridge (Fei et al, 2009), Yonghe Bridge (Li et al, 2010), etc. in China, Great Belt East Bridge (Soman et al, 2018), Oresund Bridge (Peeters et al, 2009), Henrique Bridge (Magalhães et al, 2012), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, the elements of an effective SHM system include the structure to be monitored, sensor arrangement, data acquisition system, data transfer and storage mechanism, data management, as well as data interpretation and diagnosis that are composed of system identification, structural model update, structural condition assessment, and prediction of remaining service life. Structural health monitoring system has been increasingly implemented on different kind of bridges for health monitoring all over the world: Tsing Ma Bridge (Zhang et al, 2011), Kap Shui Mun Bridge and Ting Kau Bridge (Wong, 2007), Runyang Bridge (Fei et al, 2009), Yonghe Bridge (Li et al, 2010), etc. in China, Great Belt East Bridge (Soman et al, 2018, Oresund Bridge (Peeters et al, 2009), Henrique Bridge (Magalhães et al, 2012), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the response surface method (RSM) and its improved methods have been applied in the feld of model updating [8][9][10][11][12][13]. In this paper, based on an actual OSD steel box girder bridge with steel-SFRC composite structures, we used the reference-based cross-point power spectrum method, picked up the bridge vibration signals under ambient excitation, and used the cross-point power spectrum method to identify the modal parameters of the dynamic response signals of the structure [14], and thereby obtained the modal frequencies, damping ratio, and mode shapes of the bridge. Ten we compared the fndings with the ANSYS model and updated the model by the response surface method, thus providing a reasonable fnite element model for the seismic analysis of the bridge in the strong earthquake area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vibration-based testing and monitoring of bridge structures to acquire their dynamic properties, such as natural frequencies, damping values, and mode shapes are one of the most common practice since the early 1980s (e.g., Farrar and Worden, 2007;Fei et al, 2009;Benedettini and Gentile, 2011;Wang et al, 2013Wang et al, , 2014Wang et al, , 2016Gara et al, 2016;Ivorra et al, 2017). More recently, researchers have started using pedestrian footbridges as test beds due to their flexibility and ease of testing compared to typical large-scale highway bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to a number of constraints, including the following: (a) Designer's knowledge: most rural footbridge designers are not well-versed in structural dynamics; (b) Accuracy and access for finite element modeling: informal construction practices result in large discrepancies between asbuilt dynamic properties and those predicted using finite element models (e.g., Živanović et al, 2006, 2007). This aspect generally holds true for any civil structures where full-scale monitoring or structural health monitoring methodology needs to be invoked for reliably evaluating dynamic properties of full-scale structures (e.g., Kijewski-Correa et al, 2006;Fei et al, 2009;Benedettini and Gentile, 2011;Wang et al, 2013Wang et al, , 2014Wang et al, , 2016Foti et al, 2015;Gara et al, 2016;Ivorra et al, 2017). For rural footbridges, detailed finite element modeling and analysis are even rarely carried out in design practice; (c) Deployable sensors and data management/analysis: structural monitoring equipment of industry standard is expensive and cumbersome, thus requires an expert to deploy it and perform data analysis after measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%