Mobilizing Invisible Assets

Itami, Hiroyuki; Roehl, Thomas

doi:10.4159/9780674038981

Cited by 1,177 publications

(93 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These types of resources can help explain differences in innovation. Knowledge is a resource that is susceptible to multiple uses without any loss of value [28].…”

Section: Resource-based View (Rbv)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ambidextrous Knowledge and Learning Capability: The Magic Potion for Employee Creativity and Sustainable Innovation Performance

Muñoz-Pascual

Galende

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper studies the effect that ambidextrous knowledge, i.e., oriented knowledge within a firm towards the development of exploitation activities and oriented knowledge towards the development of exploration activities, has on employee creativity, research and development, and sustainable product innovation. We contend that both tacit and explicit knowledge affect employee creativity, research and development, and sustainable product innovation. We empirically tested our hypotheses by using multisource data collected from 245 Spanish firms across fourteen industries. Our structural equation models indicate that these two types of individual knowledge predict employee creativity, which in turn strengthens research and development projects, and sustainable product innovation performance. The results confirm that the relationships between knowledge, creativity, research and development, and sustainable product innovation performance are strong with a high learning capability. A multi-group structural analysis also reveals that positive relations between tacit and explicit knowledge, employee creativity, research and development, and sustainable product innovation performance are stronger within firms that have employees with high learning capability. We provide pertinent recommendations for managers. The efforts and investments made in knowledge support the development of new ideas, new research and development projects, and sustainable product innovation success; employee learning capability has a strong influence on knowledge, creativity, and sustainable product innovation.

show abstract

“…These types of resources can help explain differences in innovation. Knowledge is a resource that is susceptible to multiple uses without any loss of value [28].…”

Section: Resource-based View (Rbv)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ambidextrous Knowledge and Learning Capability: The Magic Potion for Employee Creativity and Sustainable Innovation Performance

Muñoz-Pascual

Galende

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, the entrepreneurs can see their ventures as a bundle of resources and capabilities that may be difficult to imitate [87]. Intangible resources are also presented in the literature in the context of invisible as sets [88], internal competitive advantages [89], sustained competitive advantages [21], core competencies [90], dynamic capabilities [91], knowledge [92], market orientation [93], innovativeness [94], ability to innovate [95], or absorptive capacity [96]. There are dozens of theories and models that can help entrepreneurs to manage their resources efficiently and effectively.…”

Section: -2-resourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling (Social) Intra/Entrepreneurship Process

Carvalho

2022

Emerg Sci J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study had three objectives: to discover the main concepts and theories used in research around entrepreneurship; systematize the entrepreneurial process in a model that allows teaching it more efficiently, and substantiate the model by applying it to various social entrepreneurship projects. To this end, a systematic scoping review was carried out to identify the main concepts, theories, and processes, which constitute the six crucial building blocks to someone could be successful as a(n) (social) intra/entrepreneur. Then, a design-science approach led us to use real social innovation and social entrepreneurship cases to evaluate the constructs and the model. Consequently, it is concluded that all concepts, theories and models identified can be classified as external factors (Context and Resources), internal factors (Objectives and entrepreneurial Will) and achievements (Action and Impact). The CROWAI model fits well with the data obtained on 465 innovation and social entrepreneurship projects. Thus, this model presents a more comprehensive approach, applicable to all profitable or social intra/entrepreneurship situations, allowing this new conceptual arrangement to be more easily taught. Additionally, it makes sense to use the term ‘social’ in innovation and intra/entrepreneurship because it has excellent defining power of the scope one wants to achieve with human endeavours. Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-01-02 Full Text: PDF

show abstract

“…Furthermore, according to Serenko et al, other academics "also worked on the development of IC definitions, concepts, tools, and approaches" (Serenko and Bantis, 2013). Sveiby formed the foundation for accounting practices for measuring intangible assets (Sveiby, 1987, as cited in Serenko andBantis, 2013, 479); Itami and Roehl emphasized the role of organizational "invisible assets" including customer base and technical know-how (Itami andRoehl, 1987, as cited in Serenko andBantis, 2013, 479); Saint-Onge defined and popularized the term "customer capital," (Saint-Onge, 1996 as cited in Serenko and Bantis, 2013, 479); Wiig differentiated between IC management and KM (Wiig, 1997 as cited in Serenko andBantis, 2013, 479). In addition, Lev and Zarowin empirically demonstrated deterioration in the usefulness of traditional financial information and linked the value of intangibles to financial performance (Lev and Zarowin, 1997 as cited in Serenko andBantis, 2013, 479), andStewart (1997) drew attention of the key business stakeholders to the value of intangible assets (Stewart, 1997 as cited in Serenko andBantis, 2013, 479).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-National Distribution of Research Outputs in Accounting: A Bibliometric Analysis

Lin

Sarikas

et al. 2022

JAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents an empirical study of the cross-national distribution of research in accounting as a distinctive subject of business research using bibliometric methods. Data utilized in this study has been extracted from Scopus and sample nations include all OECD countries and Asian Newly Industrialized Economies (NIEs). Our analysis confirms a continuous process of convergence in research specialization in accounting between 1996 and 2015. We also find a developing shift in the connection between accounting and other areas of business research.

show abstract

Mobilizing Invisible Assets

Cited by 1,177 publications

References 0 publications

Ambidextrous Knowledge and Learning Capability: The Magic Potion for Employee Creativity and Sustainable Innovation Performance

Ambidextrous Knowledge and Learning Capability: The Magic Potion for Employee Creativity and Sustainable Innovation Performance

Modelling (Social) Intra/Entrepreneurship Process

Cross-National Distribution of Research Outputs in Accounting: A Bibliometric Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About