1999
DOI: 10.1006/eesa.1999.1813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility of the Organochlorine Compound Dicofol in Soil Promoted by Pseudomonas fluorescens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 7% of the bacteria poured onto the soil remained within the first 1 cm of soil. In this experiment the acaricide dicofol moved away from the bacteria toward the soil particles [10] showing that it was more strongly attracted to the soil matrix than to the living cells. Therefore in this case the soil acted as a filter/sponge, protecting microorganisms, mesofauna, plant roots and prevent-ing ground water pollution.…”
Section: Lipophilic Molecule Uptake By Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only 7% of the bacteria poured onto the soil remained within the first 1 cm of soil. In this experiment the acaricide dicofol moved away from the bacteria toward the soil particles [10] showing that it was more strongly attracted to the soil matrix than to the living cells. Therefore in this case the soil acted as a filter/sponge, protecting microorganisms, mesofauna, plant roots and prevent-ing ground water pollution.…”
Section: Lipophilic Molecule Uptake By Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Soil microorganisms represent a large part of the living biomass but in general are not used for bioaccumulation studies since they cannot be separated from the soil to measure the pollutants. Nevertheless important information could be obtained from an experiment in which antibiotic resistant bacteria with bioaccumulated difocol were introduced into the soil [10]. Radioactive 14 C-dicofol was bioaccumulated during the incubation of Pseudomonas fluorescens (soil bacteria) resistant to kanamicyn and rifampycin.…”
Section: Lipophilic Molecule Uptake By Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%