2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic adhesion of bacterial cells to sand: Cell surface properties and adhesion rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
4
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
52
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bolster et al, 2006, Jacobs et al, 2007, who reported that hydrophobicity and zeta potential play an important role in bacteria transport, but consistent with our previous observations (Lutterodt et al, 2009a and observations made by Bolster et al (2009Bolster et al ( , 2010, our results demonstrated that there was no statistically significant correlation between measured cell properties (zeta potential, motility, cell size, cell aggregation, and hydrophobicity) and transport parameters ( f , ω and s k and (C/C 0 ) max ). Bolster et al (2010) explained that additional confounding factors may be present when correlating E. coli transport to surface properties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bolster et al, 2006, Jacobs et al, 2007, who reported that hydrophobicity and zeta potential play an important role in bacteria transport, but consistent with our previous observations (Lutterodt et al, 2009a and observations made by Bolster et al (2009Bolster et al ( , 2010, our results demonstrated that there was no statistically significant correlation between measured cell properties (zeta potential, motility, cell size, cell aggregation, and hydrophobicity) and transport parameters ( f , ω and s k and (C/C 0 ) max ). Bolster et al (2010) explained that additional confounding factors may be present when correlating E. coli transport to surface properties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, r-values along transport distance were low, and did not show any pattern. These observations are in contrast to those of van Loosdrecht et al (1987a, b) and Jacobs et al (2007). On the other hand, the observed non-dependence of cell hydrophobicity on attachment was in agreement with the findings of Gannon et al (1991).…”
Section: Hydrophobicity Outer Surface Potential and Cell Sphericitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The theory indicates that biofilm adhesion decreases with increasing DE TOT 132 values (Azeredo et al 1999;Liu and Zhao 2005;Jacobs et al 2007;Bayoudh et al 2009;Hori and Matsumoto 2010). However, little work on the influence of surface energy components on DE TOT 132 or biofouling adhesion has been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 Em meios aquosos, as forças de interação polares devem-se principalmente a interações entre doadores e receptores de elétrons que representam interações do tipo ácido-base de Lewis, que são geralmente designadas por AB. 52 As interações interfaciais são relevantes para a definição de hidrofobicidade e hidrofilicidade. A diferença básica entre hidrofobicidade e hidrofilicidade é a competição entre a energia livre interfacial de coesão do sólido, imerso na água, e a energia livre de coesão do líquido.…”
Section: Interação áCido-base De Lewis (Ab)unclassified