2009
DOI: 10.1109/surv.2009.090403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility models for vehicular ad hoc networks: a survey and taxonomy

Abstract: Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) have been recently attracting an increasing attention from both research and industry communities. One of the challenges posed by the study of VANETs is the definition of a generic mobility model providing an accurate, realistic vehicular mobility description at both macroscopic and microscopic levels. Today, most mobility models for vehicular studies only consider a limited macro-mobility, involving restricted vehicles movements, while little or no attention is paid to micro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
321
0
16

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 619 publications
(339 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
321
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, SORs depend on the random meeting among the objects, hence they are stochastic in nature and depend on the mobility pattern of the objects. Although, appropriate mobility models for the smart objects, are still lacking in many applicative scenarios [8], this is not the case of IoV where several mobility models for vehicles have been developed in time [9]. Also, considering only the vehicles is not enough, the environment where they move is always populated by other smart objects which might enter in their social network and exchange information with them.…”
Section: The Simulation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, SORs depend on the random meeting among the objects, hence they are stochastic in nature and depend on the mobility pattern of the objects. Although, appropriate mobility models for the smart objects, are still lacking in many applicative scenarios [8], this is not the case of IoV where several mobility models for vehicles have been developed in time [9]. Also, considering only the vehicles is not enough, the environment where they move is always populated by other smart objects which might enter in their social network and exchange information with them.…”
Section: The Simulation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a comprehensive discussion of most of the tools mentioned above, we refer the reader to the very complete survey by Haerri et al (2009). The current state-of-art federated tools we mentioned at the end of the discussion will instead be presented in detail in Chapter X 6 6 A hands-on example: generating an urban-scale road traffic dataset…”
Section: Evolution Of Software Tools For Mobility Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we focus on the used software tools instead of specific vehicle following models like the Krauss Model or the Gipps Model. Furthermore, it should be kept in mind that there is a wide range of possible ways to implement such mobility models in VANET simulations, as presented in a comprehensive summary done by Härii et al [25].…”
Section: Mobility Models and Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%