2003
DOI: 10.1002/rem.10074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility control: How injected surfactants and biostimulants may be forced into low‐permeability units

Abstract: Recovering dense nonaqueous-phase liquid (DNAPL) remains one of the most difficult problemsfacing the remediation industry. Still, the most common method of recovering DNAPL is to physically remove the contaminants using common technologies such as total fluids recovery pumps, vacuum systems, and "pump-and-treat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent work, shear-thinning polymers have been introduced to the remediation of groundwater contamination [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], which is a mobility control method used in the petroleum industry. By the addition of polymer, the viscosity of the displacing fluid increases, and the mobility of the fluid within the hpzs decreases, which promotes enhanced transverse fluid movement of fluids into adjacent lpzs and minimizes the effects of the aquifer heterogeneities [28,32,37]. However, most of the research has focused on the coupling of polymer-water or polymer-surfactant-based remediation approaches [26,27,29,30,35,36], and the coupling of chemical oxidants and polymers remains less extensively considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent work, shear-thinning polymers have been introduced to the remediation of groundwater contamination [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], which is a mobility control method used in the petroleum industry. By the addition of polymer, the viscosity of the displacing fluid increases, and the mobility of the fluid within the hpzs decreases, which promotes enhanced transverse fluid movement of fluids into adjacent lpzs and minimizes the effects of the aquifer heterogeneities [28,32,37]. However, most of the research has focused on the coupling of polymer-water or polymer-surfactant-based remediation approaches [26,27,29,30,35,36], and the coupling of chemical oxidants and polymers remains less extensively considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…increased resistance to flow) within more permeable strata promotes enhanced transverse fluid movement (i.e. cross-flow) into adjacent lower permeability strata, mitigating preferential flow and bypassing of lower permeability strata that often limits the effectiveness of remedial treatments (Jackson et al, 2003). The net result is a more uniform fluid propagation front during injection operations and improved distribution of that fluid within heterogeneous formations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior flows are easily formed when contaminants flow by the highly permeable zones, whereas bypass flows are generated when contaminants flow through the low permeability zones. Herein, both phenomena may lead to the incomplete contact between contaminants and fillings in the PRB reaction zone [33][34][35]. In addition, after the reduction in the concentration of contaminants in highly permeable zones, under the force of concentration gradient, contaminants in low permeability zones are continuously released into highly permeable zones, increasing pollution and the cost of remediation [36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%