2020
DOI: 10.1145/3364181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MobileTrust

Abstract: Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANET) are becoming popular due to the emergence of the Internet of Things and ambient intelligence applications. In such networks, secure resource sharing functionality is accomplished by incorporating trust schemes. Current solutions adopt peer-to-peer technologies that can cover the large operational area. However, these systems fail to capture some inherent properties of VANETs, such as fast and ephemeral interaction, making robust trust evaluation of crowdsourcing challenging. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, several security issues, reliability, etc., are focused on in this study. George Hatzivasilis et al [30] suggested an efficient framework of resource sharing for VANET based on ambient intelligence. Moreover, in this work, the secure sharing of resources is achieved through a special scheme called mobile trust.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, several security issues, reliability, etc., are focused on in this study. George Hatzivasilis et al [30] suggested an efficient framework of resource sharing for VANET based on ambient intelligence. Moreover, in this work, the secure sharing of resources is achieved through a special scheme called mobile trust.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For performance evaluation of suggested system and for comparison with existing systems, we utilized the software simulator tool named NS-2 [51]; in Table 2, the suggested system is evaluated with different significant challenges such as CH duration, Average, Stability convergence, cluster member, control overhand by speed and vehicle, energy consumption and throughput of various parameters. Secure Stable-CA [51][52][53][54][55][56][57] and Moth-Flame-CA [58] were used to perform the comparison of stab Trust. Once the operation on different elements of trust, the value of stab Trust is between 0.0 to 1.0.…”
Section: Experimental and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the above limitations, this research introduces the need of a unified trust management framework that evaluates service providers' provisioned services in the MEC network considering various parameters. Trust evaluation is performed in a centralized manner, by a fully trusted third party known as cloud service manager (CSM), to grantee trust results credibility (Felix & Ricardo, 2012;Hatzivasilis et al, 2020). This also promotes for a secure and successful transactions between service users and providers in the MEC environment (Rathee et al, 2017).…”
Section: Paper Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%