2021 13th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC) 2021
DOI: 10.23919/wmnc53478.2021.9619058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Web and App QoE Monitoring for ISPs - from Encrypted Traffic to Speed Index through Machine Learning

Abstract: Web browsing is one of the key applications of the Internet. In this paper, we address the problem of mobile Web and App QoE monitoring from the Internet Service Provider (ISP) perspective, relying on in-network, passive measurements. Our study targets the analysis of Web and App QoE in mobile devices, including mobile browsing in smartphones and tablets, as well as mobile apps. As a proxy to Web QoE, we focus on the analysis of the well-known Speed Index (SI) metric. Given the wide adoption of end-to-end encr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To construct labeled datasets for both web browsing and apps, we use a measurement testbed developed in [2], based on WebPageTest (WPT) [14] and Appium libraries [15]. This testbed offers network emulation capabilities to simulate different access technologies in terms of network performance (e.g., latency, throughput, packet-loss), which adds variability and heterogeneity to the datasets.…”
Section: A Datasets Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To construct labeled datasets for both web browsing and apps, we use a measurement testbed developed in [2], based on WebPageTest (WPT) [14] and Appium libraries [15]. This testbed offers network emulation capabilities to simulate different access technologies in terms of network performance (e.g., latency, throughput, packet-loss), which adds variability and heterogeneity to the datasets.…”
Section: A Datasets Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has given rise to a wider adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) technology to improve traffic monitoring at scale. These approaches have been successfully applied to flow-level data [4], [5], [6] and packet-level (time series) data [7], [8], [9], even for the case of encrypted network traffic [10], [11], [12], [13]. Still, running ML-driven monitoring applications in real-time and at line rate is challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we build on our previous work [4], [5] to address this personalization approach, firstly by discovering classes of web pages sharing similar content-related properties through clustering techniques, and then by training per-class supervised learning models to infer the SI of individual web page loading sessions. We take the well-known SI metric as a proxy to Web QoE, based on the rich literature on Web QoE analysis [4]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%