Mobile telecommunication standardization in Japan, China, the United States, and Europe: a comparison of regulatory and industrial regimes

Abstract

The process that leads to standardization in the mobile telecommunication industry has changed considerably over time. Where it was first a national process, it has gradually changed into a more global process, and the role of the government in the standardization process has changed from very influential to less influential. The role of the government now mainly consists of creating boundary conditions such as competition rules and granting licenses to operate. Finally, the number of stakeholders involved in the standardization process had increased considerably from stand-alone development of the standard to a situation in which a multitude of companies work together to develop standards. The purpose of this paper is to create insight in the changes in standardization processes in mobile telecommunication. We analyze existing theory on standardization and dominant designs and construct a framework which includes geographic setting, governmental regimes and industrial regimes. We test this framework by analyzing the standardization processes of four generations of mobile telecommunication standards in four regions (i.e., Japan, China, the US, and Europe).

Technical standardization and total factor productivity in innovation-driven development: Evidence from China

“…Many Chinese industrial sectors were still plagued by poor productivity technologies and had only recently attained their current levels [ 89 , 90 ]. China’s further reform and opening up, WTO accession and the information technology revolution have enabled the country to make rapid technological advances in major industrial sectors since 2000 [ 91 , 92 ]. China has always wanted to enhance technological efficiency along with technological progress.…”

Knowledge-oriented leadership and technology standard innovation: a temporary-team perspective

“…Recently, many studies have considered Chinese standardization in the international market (Lee and Oh, 2006; Kwak et al , 2011; Liu and Jayakar, 2016; van de Kaa and Greeven, 2017). Chinese standardization development has changed from relying on international standards to setting standards and from relying on government enforcement to industrial organizations.…”

Six paths to Chinese company innovation

“…Moreover, as previously mentioned, Huawei has set up 28 joint innovation centers with leading telecommunications operators all over the world. By now, Huawei is a global innovation leader in telecommunications, playing a role in setting global technology standards (Van de Kaa & Greeven, 2016).…”