2010
DOI: 10.1167/6.6.872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile phone use in a driving simulation task: Differences in eye movements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no significant main effects for the other predictor variables. This finding supports our hypothesis that more frequent fixations on important events predicted good SA for those events, and supports previous research (Balk et al, 2006). It also supports the "eye-mind hypothesis;" that where a person is looking is an indicator of what they are attending to (Williams et al, 2005).…”
Section: Inferential Statisticssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were no significant main effects for the other predictor variables. This finding supports our hypothesis that more frequent fixations on important events predicted good SA for those events, and supports previous research (Balk et al, 2006). It also supports the "eye-mind hypothesis;" that where a person is looking is an indicator of what they are attending to (Williams et al, 2005).…”
Section: Inferential Statisticssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Hypotheses were based on an earlier study where eye movement variables, including the percentage of time fixating on potentially hazardous events, predicted SA in real-time scenarios (Balk, Moore, Steele & Spearman, 2006) and on previous research (e.g., Jacob & Karn, 2003). The first hypothesis was that percent of time spent fixating on an aircraft's AOIs, including both the aircraft icon and the flightstrip, would be positively associated with SA accuracy on the ten queries related to the aircraft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dishart and Land suggest that experienced drivers receive visual information from 2 sources of information Many authors have applied the analysis of eye movements to assess the level of driver's fatigue. Merat and Jamson have found differences in the level of fatigue by analyzing the pupil diameter using PERCLOS [57]. Schleicher et al determines the level of fatigue based on the frequency of blinking and saccade characteristics [58].…”
Section: Relevant Eye-tracking Indicators For Use In the Study Of Vismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings supported the "look-but-fail-to-see" phenomenon. It also revealed that increasing cognitive workload (through mobile phone use and/or increased traffic) decreases driving performance [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%