Mobile phone based AR scene assembly

Henrysson, Anders; Ollila, Mark; Billinghurst, Mark

doi:10.1145/1149488.1149504

Cited by 42 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are a large variety of application fields where services can be pervasively accessed by mobile devices, such as context-aware information provision within university campuses (Genco et al, 2005), interactive user profile-based guides in cultural heritage sites (Pilato et al, 2006;Raptis et al, 2005;Andolina et al, 2012), augmented reality objects assembly in mobility (Henrysson et al, 2005) and healthcare systems (Price and Summers, 2006;Vuong et al, 2009).…”

Section: Smartphones As Unique Interaction Devices?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet of things: why we are not there yet

Sorce¹,

Gentile²

2014

IJAHUC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Twenty-one years past since Weiser's vision of ubiquitous computing (UbiComp) has been written, and it is yet to be fully fulfilled despite of almost all the needed technologies already available. Still, the widespread interest in UbiComp and the results in some of its fields pose a question: why we are not there yet? It seems we miss the 'octopus' head. In this paper, we will try to depict the reasons why we are not there yet, from three different points of view: interaction media, device integration and applications.

show abstract

Section: Smartphones As Unique Interaction Devices?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet of things: why we are not there yet

Sorce¹,

Gentile²

2014

IJAHUC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of these studies showed that AR has great potential as a way to give instructions on how to perform more or less complicated tasks in the health care domain. Other researchers have illustrated the use of AR in process industry and object assembly [34], training and education [7], mobile phones [13], mobile applications [29] etc.…”

Section: Collaborative Augmented Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The importance of eye-contact for collaboration in AR systems

Prytz

Nilsson

Jönsson

2010

2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eye contact is believed to be an important factor in normal human communication and as a result of this a head mounted display (HMD) is often seen as something intrusive and limiting. This can be especially problematic when AR is used in a collaborative setting. The study presented in this paper aims to investigate the effects an HMD-based AR system can have on eye contact behaviour between participants in a collaborative task and thus, in extension, the effects of the HMD on collaboration itself. The focus of the study is on task-oriented collaboration between professionals. The participants worked through three different scenarios alternating between HMDs and regular paper maps with the purpose of managing the crisis response to a simulated major forest fire. Correlations between eye contact between participants and questionnaire items concerning team-and taskwork were analysed, indicating that, for the paper map condition, a high amount of eye contact is associated with low confidence and trust in the artefacts used (i.e. paper map and symbols). The amount of eye-contact in both conditions was very low. It was significantly higher for conditions without HMDs. However, the confidence and trust in the artefacts was generally rated significantly higher with HMDs than without. In conclusion, the decrease in eye contact with HMDs does not seem to have a direct effect on the collaboration in a professional, task-oriented context. This is contrary to popular assumptions and the results are relevant for future design choices for AR systems using HMDs.

show abstract

“…The results of these studies showed that AR has great potential as a way to give instructions on how to perform more or less complicated tasks in the health care domain. Other researchers have illustrated the use of AR in process industry and object assembly [28], training and education [6], mobile phones [14], mobile applications [25] etc.…”

Section: Collaborative Augmented Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Using AR to support cross-organisational collaboration in dynamic tasks

Nilsson

Johansson²,

Jönsson

2009

2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a study where Augmented Reality (AR) technology has been used as a tool for supporting collaboration between the rescue services, the police and military personnel in a crisis management scenario. There are few studies on how AR systems should be designed to improve cooperation between actors from different organizations while at the same time support individual needs. In the present study an AR system was utilized for supporting joint planning tasks by providing organisation-specific views of a shared working. The study involved a simulated emergency event conducted in close to real settings with representatives from the organisations for which the system is developed. As a baseline, a series of trials without the AR system was carried out. Results show that the users were positive towards the AR system, and would like to use it in real work. They also experience some performance benefits of using the AR system compared to their traditional tools. Finally, the problem of designing for collaborative work as well as the benefits of using an iterative design processes is discussed.

show abstract

Mobile phone based AR scene assembly

Cited by 42 publications

References 24 publications

Internet of things: why we are not there yet

Internet of things: why we are not there yet

The importance of eye-contact for collaboration in AR systems

Using AR to support cross-organisational collaboration in dynamic tasks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About