2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile indoor mapping technologies: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other range-based acquisitions were completed using the Zeb Revo RT system that is based on the SLAM technology. This relatively new technology has proven its efficiency also in the field of cultural heritage documentation as reported for example in (Chiabrando, Della Coletta, Sammartano, Spanò, & Spreafico, 2018;Otero, Lagüela, Garrido, & Arias, 2020;Tucci, Visintini, Bonora, & Parisi, 2018). Four different acquisitions were carried out performing closed-loop, as suggested by the best practices for using this system (Riisgaard & Blas, 2004) and testing different paths starting outdoor and covering indoor up to the higher accessible area.…”
Section: The Documentation Project and Field Acquisitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other range-based acquisitions were completed using the Zeb Revo RT system that is based on the SLAM technology. This relatively new technology has proven its efficiency also in the field of cultural heritage documentation as reported for example in (Chiabrando, Della Coletta, Sammartano, Spanò, & Spreafico, 2018;Otero, Lagüela, Garrido, & Arias, 2020;Tucci, Visintini, Bonora, & Parisi, 2018). Four different acquisitions were carried out performing closed-loop, as suggested by the best practices for using this system (Riisgaard & Blas, 2004) and testing different paths starting outdoor and covering indoor up to the higher accessible area.…”
Section: The Documentation Project and Field Acquisitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of this paper is not to present a complete summary of mobile agents’ navigation, but to focus on the discussions of multiple sensors’ fusion methods in mobile agents’ indoor navigation. In spite of several recent publications on related work [ 14 , 15 ], this work is obviously different from them, in that we focus on the multi-sensor fusion methods rather than a discussion of positioning [ 14 ], mapping, and way finding [ 15 ]. Namely, we focus on the discussion of sensors’ functionalities and the fusion methods of them in navigation rather than pure algorithms or the navigation task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) techniques are an efficient alternative for the computation of the trajectory but do not guarantee the precision required in applications such as quality control during construction works. The reason is that most MLS systems are equipped with low-cost and lower performance laser devices in order to cope with the weight requirements [23], such as Velodyne HDL-32 or Hokuyo UTM in Zeb-Revo system, that present maximum nominal precision between 2 and 3 cm [24], not comparable with the millimetre-precision of TLS systems [25]. Di Filippo et al [21] use a MLS to create the 3D models of existing buildings in a short time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding user intervention with MLS, the systems in the market that are adequate for indoor mapping require to be pushed or carried by the user [23]. Thus, their use is limited in scenarios with elements of risk such as obstacles and hanging pieces, as well as in difficult-access areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%