2010
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2010.03.090706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile element assisted cooperative localization for wireless sensor networks with obstacles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature [2] introduced a coordinate influence coefficient estimates, improving the accuracy of node localization to solve the problem of sparse beacon nodes. Literature [3] from the security considerations nodes in the network, the nodes to achieve safe positioning ideas presented SAPIT algorithm. Literature [4] for sparse node localization inaccurate positioning algorithm proposed superimposed annular region ROCRSSI, the algorithm control signals are issued beacon nodes, node density connectivity and neighbors will not affect its error rate, but the algorithm is more complex.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Improved Apit Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature [2] introduced a coordinate influence coefficient estimates, improving the accuracy of node localization to solve the problem of sparse beacon nodes. Literature [3] from the security considerations nodes in the network, the nodes to achieve safe positioning ideas presented SAPIT algorithm. Literature [4] for sparse node localization inaccurate positioning algorithm proposed superimposed annular region ROCRSSI, the algorithm control signals are issued beacon nodes, node density connectivity and neighbors will not affect its error rate, but the algorithm is more complex.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Improved Apit Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positioning accuracy is high. When the beacon nodes is less than six and the count cannot be added since the density of beacon node is not averagely, neighbor nodes will be used for the calculation [2][3]. The location of neighbor will be calculated firstly since neighbor may be another unknown node.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we considered the RSS error histograms We can recognize two class of RSS-based localization algorithms: range-based, which use several target-toanchor distance estimations obtained through the RSS measurements, and range-free, which determine the position of the target node without performing distance estimation [5], [23].…”
Section: B Channel Parameters Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, range free localization algorithms are categorized based on the deployment scenarios. The categorization has been divided into four groups: (1) static sensor nodes and static anchor nodes [34,35]; (2) static sensor nodes and mobile anchor nodes [36,37]; (3) mobile sensor nodes and static anchor nodes [38,39]; and (4) mobile sensor nodes and mobile anchor nodes [40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%