2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1506-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Apps to Quantify Aspects of Physical Activity: a Systematic Review on its Reliability and Validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a systematic review of mobile apps to quantify aspects of physical activity, 20% (5/25) of the studies investigated the validity of mobile apps when measuring distance using GNSS information [ 6 ]. Mean percentage errors ranged between 2% and 10%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a systematic review of mobile apps to quantify aspects of physical activity, 20% (5/25) of the studies investigated the validity of mobile apps when measuring distance using GNSS information [ 6 ]. Mean percentage errors ranged between 2% and 10%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creation of more precise and nuanced behavioral digital phenotypes is not only important but also very timely [ 3 ]. In particular, physical activity level monitoring has applications in a variety of medical areas [ 4 ]. For example, in psychiatry, activity monitoring can be used to assess and to detect changes in depression severity [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the patients faced some major problems and uncertainties, such as questions on the optimal usage and the price of specific apps; they doubted the validity of the information delivered and questioned issues of security and privacy [ 27 ]. Studies found that mobile apps can give conflicting information, and the source of recommendation is often unclear and insufficient, and therefore they are often used as complementary to evidence-based information [ 28 , 29 ]. Therefore, women’s perception regarding books might be more valid and evidence-based as compared to preconceptions regarding mobile apps [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%