2020
DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v15i08.12551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Application Development for Technology Enhanced Learning: An Applied Study on the Students of the College of Mass Communication at Ajman University

Abstract: Educational applications play an important role in modern education. Based on this, the objectives of this study are as follows: analyze a student interview (focus group) that has been conducted among University student of college of Mass Communication at Ajman University; determine the characteristics of educational applications; find out possible advantages and disadvantages of educational applications; formulate, including based on a student interview, criteria for choosing educational applications; divide … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Born as an extension of e-learning, m-learning has evolved into a different frame (Parson et al, 2007;Vavoula and Sharples, 2009;Koole, 2009;Dennen and Hao, 2014;Hsu and Ching, 2015;Parsazadeh et al, 2018). M-learning has also been approached from a theoretical point of view as a domain with its identity (Traxler, 2009;Pachler et al, 2010;Kearney et al, 2012;Ko et al, 2015;Al-Said, 2020;Al-Rahmi, 2021). In this evolutionary line, the phenomenon of mobile information literacy emerges in the literature (Walsh, 2012;Havelka, 2013;Ng, 2013;Bergdahl, 2020;Blau et al, 2020;Matula, 2020;Moya and Camacho, 2020;Hidayat, 2022).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Born as an extension of e-learning, m-learning has evolved into a different frame (Parson et al, 2007;Vavoula and Sharples, 2009;Koole, 2009;Dennen and Hao, 2014;Hsu and Ching, 2015;Parsazadeh et al, 2018). M-learning has also been approached from a theoretical point of view as a domain with its identity (Traxler, 2009;Pachler et al, 2010;Kearney et al, 2012;Ko et al, 2015;Al-Said, 2020;Al-Rahmi, 2021). In this evolutionary line, the phenomenon of mobile information literacy emerges in the literature (Walsh, 2012;Havelka, 2013;Ng, 2013;Bergdahl, 2020;Blau et al, 2020;Matula, 2020;Moya and Camacho, 2020;Hidayat, 2022).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al Said (2020) emphasized that "the effective integration of mobile technology into educational practices depends on factors related to people, design (content and technology), and institutions (policies and strategies)". That is why it turns into a challenge.…”
Section: Mobile Learning and Mobile Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two aspects are intrinsically linked to the so-called micro-learning, an approach that subordinates learning through the fragmentation and segmentation of content. This idea is based on what was discussed in previous paragraphs, a current society flooded with information and content 24 h a day (Arrastia and Tackett, 2020; Al Said, 2020). The impossibility of acquiring everything moves toward very specific and concise content approaches, micro-learning, whose educational linkage can be ideal with ML or b-learning (Lai and Hwang, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With their advantages of rich content and ease-of-use, online education platforms and mobile education platforms have broken through the limits of conventional education mode in terms of fixed positions, fixed teaching environment, fixed teaching content, and fixed teachers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. At the same time, students' learning requirements are developing toward the direction of searching for services of personalized learning and fragmented learning [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Most education platforms attempt to plan reasonable learning paths for college student users, but they have generally ignored differences in their learning time distribution preferences, learning habits, and learning requirements, and haven't taken the dynamic development trends of their learning states into consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%