Mo1671 ADENOMA DETECTION WITH ENDOCUFF-ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY

Lasa, Juan S.; Torella, Constanza; Berman, Susan; Paola, Leandro E. Di; Caniggia, Diego; Butierrez, Federico; Jeannot, Joaquin; Ahumada, María C.; Zagalsky, David

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2029

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Results1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JCG/A818). Overall, these 57 multiarm trials testing assist devices included 31,051 patients 10–67…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Efficacy of Endoscopic Assist Devices on Colonic Adenoma Detection

Weissman

Mehta

Stein³

et al. 2022

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aims: Numerous endoscopic assist devices exist, yet data surrounding their comparative efficacy is lacking. We conducted a systematic review with network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy of endoscopic assist devices on colonic adenoma detection.Methods: A systematic search was performed using multiple electronic databases through July 2020, to identify all randomized controlled trials and dual-arm observational studies compared with either other endoscopic assist devices and/or standard colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes included polyp detection rate (PDR), serrated adenoma detection rate (SADR), right-sided adenoma detection rate (RADR), and proximal adenoma detection rate (PADR).Results: Fifty-seven studies (31,051 patients) met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Network meta-analysis identified an enhanced ADR among (clear) cap [odds ratio (

show abstract

“…1, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JCG/A818). Overall, these 57 multiarm trials testing assist devices included 31,051 patients 10–67…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%